Democratic Primaries

BusyBeingBest

(9,173 posts)

55. Yes. She has no way to win, she wants to be there to attack

Reply to yardwork (Reply #47)

Sat Mar 7, 2020, 11:21 AM

Mar 2020

Biden. She will try to do to him what she did to Harris. What would be the point of allowing this to happen?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The DNC just made it mathematically impossible for Tulsi Gabbard to make the next debate [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2020 OP

Good RandySF Mar 2020 #1

Good. dhol82 Mar 2020 #2

That Democratic Establishment conspiring yet again! DonaldsRump Mar 2020 #3

she couldnt get enough ppl to care about her candidacy up to now. why reward her? nt msongs Mar 2020 #4

As it should. TwilightZone Mar 2020 #5

I'm no fan of Tulsi, but this is vindictive establishment politics IronLionZion Mar 2020 #6

So it has nothing to do with her delegate count. Okay. zackymilly Mar 2020 #9

No it isn't Cha Mar 2020 #10

It's targeted at Tulsi to shut her out of debates IronLionZion Mar 2020 #16

There are good reasons to shuttle Gabbard out of the debate Bucky Mar 2020 #23

Good. She's not a real candidate. No reason to continue humoring her this late in the process. tritsofme Mar 2020 #25

Why Should Anyone with 2 Delegates Be On Debate Stage At this Point? Indykatie Mar 2020 #30

a find that this statement insulting beachbumbob Mar 2020 #40

Nonsense. Seriously, that is silly. yardwork Mar 2020 #46

+++ still_one Mar 2020 #52

No. She is not a viable candidate . This reminds me of Nader in 2000 still_one Mar 2020 #53

How many delegates has she won so far? patphil Mar 2020 #7

More than Bloomberg when he participated in the last two debates question everything Mar 2020 #12

Sorry, after Super Tuesday the criteria for getting on the stage has changed. patphil Mar 2020 #61

Biden had 7 before South Carolina jimfields33 Mar 2020 #43

She's a disruptor, friendly to the right. IluvPitties Mar 2020 #45

What's the harm? Potentially losing the White House and Congress. yardwork Mar 2020 #47

Yes. She has no way to win, she wants to be there to attack BusyBeingBest Mar 2020 #55

Can't top the DU GDP banner play though ibegurpard Mar 2020 #8

Thank you! Cha Mar 2020 #11

I agree with this... Moderateguy Mar 2020 #13

Are you sporting the Tulsi badge ironically? IronLionZion Mar 2020 #17

Yes, showing her some love.... Moderateguy Mar 2020 #18

Lead with love! IronLionZion Mar 2020 #19

You don't know what her actual agenda is, but you're promoting her on DU? yardwork Mar 2020 #48

She's the one percent IronLionZion Mar 2020 #56

Not a Tulsi fan but... RDavisJ1 Mar 2020 #14

Real Question Is Why Hasn't Tulsi Gabbard Dropped Out And Endorsed Bernie? TomCADem Mar 2020 #15

Maybe she's waiting for Cha Mar 2020 #22

(Cough) VP (Cough) nt sweetloukillbot Mar 2020 #58

Tulsi is not really running for President, she is running to cash in as a new Fox News host Las Vegas Mixx Mar 2020 #20

This. Salviati Mar 2020 #28

After she went on tucker carlson's to Cha Mar 2020 #35

Move over Joe Lieberman. Photogenic Tulsi has become the Faux News favorite "? Democrat ?" LVZ Mar 2020 #36

this and a 3rd party run paid for by trump and putin?? beachbumbob Mar 2020 #41

Good. She shouldn't be there but doesn't have enough good graces to get the heck out Vivienne235729 Mar 2020 #21

Good. She's a lot of things, but a Democrat, even a small-d democrat, is not one of them. Hekate Mar 2020 #24

Will anybody really care? If I were to ask my neighbors, my sons, or my husband who she is, napi21 Mar 2020 #26

Evidently only billionaires get cut a break. Shemp Howard Mar 2020 #27

The voters did decide tirebiter Mar 2020 #29

That was AFTER the debate. Shemp Howard Mar 2020 #31

Did she qualify through the other ways Hav Mar 2020 #32

As I understand it... Shemp Howard Mar 2020 #33

I don't object, but I don't see the harm of letting her be there, either. ucrdem Mar 2020 #34

At this point, it isn't about participation dansolo Mar 2020 #42

She would certainly attack Biden. She attacks the Democratic Party often. yardwork Mar 2020 #49

Ask Kamala Harris if Tulsi's presence on the debate stage was harmless. BusyBeingBest Mar 2020 #54

If funny how the people who constantly demand change in our party always get mad about changes. Scurrilous Mar 2020 #37

A Amen! Cha Mar 2020 #38

a 1% percenter being denied, about time right? beachbumbob Mar 2020 #39

Very disappointed but not surprised by the DNC's actions Devil Child Mar 2020 #44

The DNC owes Gabbard nothing. She's proven herself to be untrustworthy. yardwork Mar 2020 #50

Is she still waiting for her participation trophy? greatauntoftriplets Mar 2020 #51

Here's one for her Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2020 #60

Bad optics for the DNC, but it's just one more thing in a pattern. aikoaiko Mar 2020 #57

Political parties are expected to have strategies to win. yardwork Mar 2020 #59