Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,433 posts)
42. You have it backward.
Fri Apr 12, 2019, 10:17 AM
Apr 2019

The case


Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974),[1] was a significant United States Supreme Court case dealing with the planned desegregation busing of public school students across district lines among 53 school districts in metropolitan Detroit. It concerned the plans to integrate public schools in the United States following the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision.[2]




Argument by NAACP


The NAACP argued that although schools were not officially segregated (white only), the city of Detroit and the State as represented by its surrounding counties had enacted policies to increase racial segregation in schools. The NAACP also suggested a direct relationship between unfair housing practices (such as redlining) and educational segregation.[8]


Finding by lower court agreeing with NAACP


District Judge Stephen J. Roth held the State of Michigan as well as the school districts accountable for the segregation. The Sixth Circuit Court affirmed some of the decision, specifically the official segregation that had been practiced by the City's school district, but the Appeals Court withheld judgment on the relationship of housing segregation with education. The Court specified that it was the state's responsibility to integrate across the segregated metropolitan area.[9]




Finding by Supreme Court overturning pro NAACP ruling



The Supreme Court overturned the lower courts in a 5-to-4 decision, holding that school districts were not obligated to desegregate unless it had been proven that the lines were drawn with racist intent on the part of the districts. Thus, superficially arbitrary lines drawn by State agencies which produced segregated districts were not illegal.[4][10]


Dissent by Marshall


Justice Thurgood Marshall's dissenting opinion stated that:

School district lines, however innocently drawn, will surely be perceived as fences to separate the races when, under a Detroit-only decree, white parents withdraw their children from the Detroit city schools and move to the suburbs in order to continue them in all-white schools.[11]
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Whomever gains momentum. LakeArenal Apr 2019 #1
+1 BannonsLiver Apr 2019 #2
Will CNN will do a story on how Sanders was living in a basement stealing electricity at that time? LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #3
Or someone farted and covered the world with glitter and as a result raised $10 million in 30 days Indygram Apr 2019 #5
lol BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #7
I was trying to be nice Indygram Apr 2019 #8
I wouldn't worry too much about it BannonsLiver Apr 2019 #9
Well, I actually got an email a few days asking me to organize canvassing for Beto from his campaign Indygram Apr 2019 #11
He has talent BannonsLiver Apr 2019 #13
I just noticed on twitter that Beto is organizing a 50 state canvassing event this weekend Indygram Apr 2019 #14
This should be an OP nt BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #23
Yes, True Blue American Apr 2019 #29
Biden-Beto would be an unbeatable ticket nt BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #12
I really like Biden too Indygram Apr 2019 #15
Biden was a sitting Senator dsc Apr 2019 #17
Yes, and he took a position against a well meaning but poorly implementd plan that tore a city apart LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #20
Statements that he made at the time went a bit beyond that. CentralMass Apr 2019 #31
It won't hurt Biden. Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #4
It's a non story BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #6
no Marshall didn't dsc Apr 2019 #16
Correct.As Jessie Jackson said, "it's not the bus, it's us" Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #19
Read Post No. 21 BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #22
You are plain, flat out wrong dsc Apr 2019 #39
You have it backward. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #42
You are wrong. BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #21
ah no, he was advocating for BUSING ACROSS DISTRICT LINES IN THAT CASE dsc Apr 2019 #26
He was NOT BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #28
No they most certainly didn't dsc Apr 2019 #37
Wrong decision! True Blue American Apr 2019 #33
I was against bussing! True Blue American Apr 2019 #32
We shouldn't have a presidential candidate who has to defend things he did like 45 years ago. BlueStater Apr 2019 #10
I was politically aware at that time. There was so much resistance Kahuna7 Apr 2019 #18
Yes, that's what I recall too. I was in school at the time and white parents were not allowing. marylandblue Apr 2019 #25
Not before it destroyed the system. True Blue American Apr 2019 #34
I don't become emotionally involved with my candidates... brooklynite Apr 2019 #24
Same here. Conversely I dont feel the need to sycophanticaly defend them. CentralMass Apr 2019 #35
He has been on the wrong side of a LOT of issues. sfwriter Apr 2019 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Apr 2019 #43
CNN is doing Biden a favor here. Skinner Apr 2019 #30
I agree. nt Kahuna7 Apr 2019 #40
CNN has seriously disappointed me over the last couple of months. I love Tapper, Acosta and dewsgirl Apr 2019 #36
The silver lining for Biden in all of this.... Funtatlaguy Apr 2019 #38
Biden has a target on his back because he is leading, even MineralMan Apr 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»CNN with ridiculous hit p...»Reply #42