Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: CNN with ridiculous hit piece on Biden [View all]Hassin Bin Sober
(27,433 posts)42. You have it backward.
The case
Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974),[1] was a significant United States Supreme Court case dealing with the planned desegregation busing of public school students across district lines among 53 school districts in metropolitan Detroit. It concerned the plans to integrate public schools in the United States following the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision.[2]
Argument by NAACP
The NAACP argued that although schools were not officially segregated (white only), the city of Detroit and the State as represented by its surrounding counties had enacted policies to increase racial segregation in schools. The NAACP also suggested a direct relationship between unfair housing practices (such as redlining) and educational segregation.[8]
Finding by lower court agreeing with NAACP
District Judge Stephen J. Roth held the State of Michigan as well as the school districts accountable for the segregation. The Sixth Circuit Court affirmed some of the decision, specifically the official segregation that had been practiced by the City's school district, but the Appeals Court withheld judgment on the relationship of housing segregation with education. The Court specified that it was the state's responsibility to integrate across the segregated metropolitan area.[9]
Finding by Supreme Court overturning pro NAACP ruling
The Supreme Court overturned the lower courts in a 5-to-4 decision, holding that school districts were not obligated to desegregate unless it had been proven that the lines were drawn with racist intent on the part of the districts. Thus, superficially arbitrary lines drawn by State agencies which produced segregated districts were not illegal.[4][10]
Dissent by Marshall
Justice Thurgood Marshall's dissenting opinion stated that:
School district lines, however innocently drawn, will surely be perceived as fences to separate the races when, under a Detroit-only decree, white parents withdraw their children from the Detroit city schools and move to the suburbs in order to continue them in all-white schools.[11]
School district lines, however innocently drawn, will surely be perceived as fences to separate the races when, under a Detroit-only decree, white parents withdraw their children from the Detroit city schools and move to the suburbs in order to continue them in all-white schools.[11]
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Will CNN will do a story on how Sanders was living in a basement stealing electricity at that time?
LongtimeAZDem
Apr 2019
#3
Or someone farted and covered the world with glitter and as a result raised $10 million in 30 days
Indygram
Apr 2019
#5
Well, I actually got an email a few days asking me to organize canvassing for Beto from his campaign
Indygram
Apr 2019
#11
I just noticed on twitter that Beto is organizing a 50 state canvassing event this weekend
Indygram
Apr 2019
#14
Yes, and he took a position against a well meaning but poorly implementd plan that tore a city apart
LongtimeAZDem
Apr 2019
#20
We shouldn't have a presidential candidate who has to defend things he did like 45 years ago.
BlueStater
Apr 2019
#10
Yes, that's what I recall too. I was in school at the time and white parents were not allowing.
marylandblue
Apr 2019
#25