Democratic Primaries

Celerity

(54,015 posts)

29. there are more than that, especially if certain people run

Sat Apr 20, 2019, 07:16 PM

Apr 2019

Besides those 3 you listed

McSally in AZ is definitely vulnerable, Mark Kelley should take her out
Cornyn in TX if Beto runs maybe be vulnerable
Perdue in GA will be in big trouble if Stacey Abrams runs

KS and TN, whilst longshots, have no incumbent Rethug running

and If McConnell is exposed in collusion/corruption, maybe even a shot there, with the right opponent

Jones is going to lose in AL, unfortunately, that fucking Paedo Moore is soundly beating him in the polls already (they are fucking crazy) and a 'regualr' Rethug will win by an even larger share

we need a net swing of plus 4 to take back the Senate (all the rest of our seats are safe)

Jones will probably lose

so we need 5

ME, CO, NC, AZ, GA wins give us control of the Senate

maybe one of the other 4 comes through, especially if our POTUS candidate has coattails

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Question for Elizabeth Warren... [View all] louis c Apr 2019 OP

Or, let's force a vote and see where your Senator running for re-election stands on the rule of law PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #1

There are no more than 2 or 3 Republicans at risk louis c Apr 2019 #2

Don't you think there would be more Republicans at risk if people saw their Senator would not... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #4

Not in the states I listed here and where the Senator is in his term of office. louis c Apr 2019 #6

there are more than that, especially if certain people run Celerity Apr 2019 #29

there best shot at losing those seats is to vote for conviction louis c Apr 2019 #33

Its the right thing to do JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #3

Tell'em Elizabeth! PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #5

How many virtuos arguments have been made at the Supreme Court in the past 4 years... louis c Apr 2019 #7

True JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #10

Please click on this link and tell me who the 67 votes are louis c Apr 2019 #11

I dont care JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #12

Well, that's where we differ. I do care. louis c Apr 2019 #14

Im also JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #16

Trying and failing certainly doesn't strengthen our hand louis c Apr 2019 #18

None taken JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #20

Just a little background, then, on me... louis c Apr 2019 #25

Joe Biden JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #27

Until you address Russia, you will not weaken the enemy. delisen Apr 2019 #54

Count Votes and Win Elections louis c Apr 2019 #8

I agree with you. The House has a constitutional duty to impeach. Demit Apr 2019 #9

Very good point! Wish I had made it... CTyankee Apr 2019 #41

No, it doesn't. LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #46

I took an oath JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #13

God Bless You. louis c Apr 2019 #15

We wonder where we get a artislife Apr 2019 #17

Let's try to win an election, rather than to make a point. louis c Apr 2019 #19

Using this justification JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #22

or, you can get the votes from somwhere else and not be held hostage. louis c Apr 2019 #26

No to the "secondary to your cause" question artislife Apr 2019 #24

Good. Go out and get me 67 Senators who agree with you... louis c Apr 2019 #34

Somehow I am the lynchpin to this mess artislife Apr 2019 #36

You are wrong... louis c Apr 2019 #42

+∞ LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #43

What does +00 mean? louis c Apr 2019 #44

That's "plus infinity" LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #45

OK. Thanks. louis c Apr 2019 #47

I agree with you 100%, and I'll be quoting your "three word summary" in the future LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #48

Congress is not obligated in any way; it is solely the discretion of the House LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #21

This is not Bill Clinton JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #23

I remember watching the watergate hearings against Nixon, I also remember the damage it did to him & yaesu Apr 2019 #28

You can have the hearings without calling it impeachment. louis c Apr 2019 #31

the powers of oversight are very limited yaesu Apr 2019 #49

There are not even... Mike Nelson Apr 2019 #30

I think it's a bit early to start counting votes Bradshaw3 Apr 2019 #32

we can walk and chew gum at the same time shanny Apr 2019 #35

As long as we stay focused on getting Trump out of office... louis c Apr 2019 #37

This isn't a criminal case, and tRump isn't the only problem. shanny Apr 2019 #38

We can do that with impeachment. Oversight accomplishes that... louis c Apr 2019 #39

Also, what put these people in a "position to do it" was losing an election louis c Apr 2019 #40

Not "an" election. Many elections. And why is that, exactly? shanny Apr 2019 #50

Are you sure that Mueller will back us up if and when he testifies? louis c Apr 2019 #55

who the eff cares about what Mueller says, personally? shanny Apr 2019 #56

Try moving forward with affirmative public opinion and 67 Senators without Mueller. louis c Apr 2019 #57

I tend to agree with you. David__77 Apr 2019 #51

It's a political decision either way SHRED Apr 2019 #52

good points-but Russia is still corrupting our vote delisen Apr 2019 #53