Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(136,290 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:47 PM Apr 2019

The Long Run: Pete Buttigieg Fired South Bend's Black Police Chief. It Still Stings. [View all]

SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Pete Buttigieg had been mayor just 13 weeks when he faced a leadership crisis.

It was March 2012, and 300 residents of South Bend, Ind., solemnly marched to the Martin Luther King Center to protest the killing in Florida of a black teenager, Trayvon Martin.

A prominent figure at the demonstration was Darryl Boykins, South Bend’s first black police chief. Admired for teaching tennis and boxing to young people, he had been promoted to chief five years earlier after winning the respect of both black and white officers in a department that sometimes divided along racial lines.

Mr. Buttigieg addressed the protesters, but seemed not to interact with Mr. Boykins. What no one in the crowd knew was that the police top brass were in turmoil — shaken by allegations that Mr. Boykins had improperly taped phone calls of senior white officers who were said to have used racist language, including about him.

With federal prosecutors scrutinizing Mr. Boykins, the 29-year-old mayor fired the veteran police chief just before the Trayvon Martin protest. No action was taken against the officers. Precisely what they said on the tapes of their department phone calls is unknown to the public: Mr. Buttigieg has refused to release them, saying the matter is still being resolved in court.

In the weeks, months and years that followed, the removal of Mr. Boykins unleashed a blizzard of claims, counterclaims and lawsuits, as well as anguish among South Bend’s minority residents over whether an ambitious white mayor had sided with white police officers against a black chief. The day after Mr. Boykins’s dismissal, he was applauded at a gathering of 100 officers, council members and clergy. The events played out against a backdrop of frustration among some African-Americans that they have not benefited equally from an economic resurgence in South Bend, which Mr. Buttigieg extols in his presidential bid.

As Mr. Buttigieg seeks the Democratic nomination in a party whose base is anchored by minority voters, his handling of Mr. Boykins’ dismissal and its messy aftermath raise questions whether the mayor either misunderstood or mishandled sensitivities surrounding race and policing in the place he knew best, a city which is 37 percent black and Latino.

“It felt stomach-churning,” Mr. Buttigieg recalled of the night of the 2012 protest, speaking in an interview. “To know that that same day, we were at what even then I understood was going to be the beginning of an incredibly painful and divisive moment of race relations in my city.”

-more-

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-long-run-pete-buttigieg-fired-south-bends-black-police-chief-it-still-stings/ar-BBW6Sb4?li=BBnb7Kz

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mayor Pete will need to address this with transparency mcar Apr 2019 #1
Personnel issues can't be discussed in public. yardwork Apr 2019 #18
A 'new' DUer posted about this yesterday, and elleng Apr 2019 #2
Its been removed, as well as the "new" poster. But the comments remain. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #4
Right elleng Apr 2019 #5
Was it the same topic as this OP or something different? oldsoftie Apr 2019 #7
Similar, it included NYT article on the subject. elleng Apr 2019 #8
Thank you. I see a whole lot of nothing. But this is to be expected in a political race. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #11
I like Buttigieg, but if this incident poisons him with the AA community MH1 Apr 2019 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #31
reading the entire thing dsc Apr 2019 #3
Regardless of what they said or didnt say, the invasion of privacy issue would remain. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #6
From another article on the incident. rogue emissary Apr 2019 #23
other reports say the first recording was an accident dsc Apr 2019 #27
He didn't fire him, he ultimately demoted him, and the chief was under FBI investigation Celerity Apr 2019 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #13
But ultimately he was not fired. He stayed on till mid 2017. Celerity Apr 2019 #14
there may be political skulduggery in this case, as the judge it was kicked down to,(after a Federal Celerity Apr 2019 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #16
It must be let's bash Pete day leftofcool Apr 2019 #17
This was the first time I saw the story Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2019 #19
WP is also looking at the African-American vote dalton99a Apr 2019 #21
Right, and lots of 'removed' posts. elleng Apr 2019 #22
Even the people who recced this thread are PPRd. demmiblue Apr 2019 #24
yep, every one of them is the same troll (they also were Bilirubin, now banned, I am pretty sure) Celerity Apr 2019 #32
Well, you can get a post removed for sneezing too. But i didnt see these before they were hidden oldsoftie Apr 2019 #28
I haven't looked into the 'sneezing' part, elleng Apr 2019 #29
Why was he not charged? What do the tapes reveal? brush Apr 2019 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #30
There were two people fired, it wasn't only the chief. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The Long Run: Pete Buttig...»Reply #0