Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Celerity

(54,628 posts)
9. He didn't fire him, he ultimately demoted him, and the chief was under FBI investigation
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 10:07 PM
Apr 2019

for illegal wiretapping at the time.

Boykins did resign, then took it back, at which point Buttigieg demoted him.


Boykins stayed on with the force and retired in 2017

Former South Bend Police Chief announces retirement from law enforcement
By Tom Franklin - July 8, 2017


https://www.953mnc.com/2017/07/08/former-south-bend-police-chief-announces-retirement-law-enforcement/




The chief continued to record the officers AFTER he accidentally found out that they were being taped (this started before Pete was mayor).

Also, the tapes have not been released because a Federal judge ruled in 2015 they were illegal wiretapping. That was appealed and kicked back to a state court, where it stands now.


Judge Rules Some South Bend Police Department Recordings Violated Wiretap Act

http://southbendvoice.com/2015/01/14/judge-rules-some-south-bend-police-department-recordings-violated-wiretap-act/





https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/17/politics/pete-buttigieg-south-bend-tapes/index.html

The mayor addresses the tapes case at length in his memoir and writes that his initial decision to reappoint Boykins -- who had been appointed to the position by Buttigieg's predecessor -- when he took office in January 2012 was his "first serious mistake as mayor."

"The chief, believing that some other officers were gunning for his job, allegedly confronted them with tape recordings that could embarrass them if disclosed," Buttigieg writes. "He had access to these tapes because some phone lines in the department were connected to recording equipment used for interviews and investigations, and the officers had been recorded on that equipment without their knowledge."

Buttigieg goes on to write that he learned -- a few weeks into his first term -- that Boykins was under investigation by the FBI for possibly violating the Federal Wiretap Act.




https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/438669-secret-tapes-linger-over-buttigiegs-meteoric-rise


In 2011, Karen DePaepe, a 25-year veteran of the South Bend Police Department in charge of the dispatch and communications center, informed Boykins that the desk phone line for Detective Bryan Young was being taped.

A previous police chief had authorized taping the phone line because the detective at the time didn’t want to miss any possible tips. Boykins allowed the taping, now on Young’s phone line, to continue but did not inform the detective that his calls were being recorded.

About a year later, shortly after Buttigieg had been elected to his first term in office at the age of 29, DePaepe discovered recordings on the line that she said revealed racist remarks and a potential criminal conspiracy between officers.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Mayor Pete will need to address this with transparency mcar Apr 2019 #1
Personnel issues can't be discussed in public. yardwork Apr 2019 #18
A 'new' DUer posted about this yesterday, and elleng Apr 2019 #2
Its been removed, as well as the "new" poster. But the comments remain. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #4
Right elleng Apr 2019 #5
Was it the same topic as this OP or something different? oldsoftie Apr 2019 #7
Similar, it included NYT article on the subject. elleng Apr 2019 #8
Thank you. I see a whole lot of nothing. But this is to be expected in a political race. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #11
I like Buttigieg, but if this incident poisons him with the AA community MH1 Apr 2019 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #31
reading the entire thing dsc Apr 2019 #3
Regardless of what they said or didnt say, the invasion of privacy issue would remain. oldsoftie Apr 2019 #6
From another article on the incident. rogue emissary Apr 2019 #23
other reports say the first recording was an accident dsc Apr 2019 #27
He didn't fire him, he ultimately demoted him, and the chief was under FBI investigation Celerity Apr 2019 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #13
But ultimately he was not fired. He stayed on till mid 2017. Celerity Apr 2019 #14
there may be political skulduggery in this case, as the judge it was kicked down to,(after a Federal Celerity Apr 2019 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #16
It must be let's bash Pete day leftofcool Apr 2019 #17
This was the first time I saw the story Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2019 #19
WP is also looking at the African-American vote dalton99a Apr 2019 #21
Right, and lots of 'removed' posts. elleng Apr 2019 #22
Even the people who recced this thread are PPRd. demmiblue Apr 2019 #24
yep, every one of them is the same troll (they also were Bilirubin, now banned, I am pretty sure) Celerity Apr 2019 #32
Well, you can get a post removed for sneezing too. But i didnt see these before they were hidden oldsoftie Apr 2019 #28
I haven't looked into the 'sneezing' part, elleng Apr 2019 #29
Why was he not charged? What do the tapes reveal? brush Apr 2019 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #30
There were two people fired, it wasn't only the chief. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The Long Run: Pete Buttig...»Reply #9