Democratic Primaries

yaesu

(9,292 posts)

49. the powers of oversight are very limited

Sun Apr 21, 2019, 11:09 AM

Apr 2019

they could have hearings but with zero cooperation from the fascists ignoring subpoenas, ect... it would just be going through the report, questioning a few witnesses who show up voluntarily while tRump makes his witch hunt speeches.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Question for Elizabeth Warren... [View all] louis c Apr 2019 OP

Or, let's force a vote and see where your Senator running for re-election stands on the rule of law PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #1

There are no more than 2 or 3 Republicans at risk louis c Apr 2019 #2

Don't you think there would be more Republicans at risk if people saw their Senator would not... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #4

Not in the states I listed here and where the Senator is in his term of office. louis c Apr 2019 #6

there are more than that, especially if certain people run Celerity Apr 2019 #29

there best shot at losing those seats is to vote for conviction louis c Apr 2019 #33

Its the right thing to do JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #3

Tell'em Elizabeth! PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #5

How many virtuos arguments have been made at the Supreme Court in the past 4 years... louis c Apr 2019 #7

True JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #10

Please click on this link and tell me who the 67 votes are louis c Apr 2019 #11

I dont care JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #12

Well, that's where we differ. I do care. louis c Apr 2019 #14

Im also JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #16

Trying and failing certainly doesn't strengthen our hand louis c Apr 2019 #18

None taken JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #20

Just a little background, then, on me... louis c Apr 2019 #25

Joe Biden JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #27

Until you address Russia, you will not weaken the enemy. delisen Apr 2019 #54

Count Votes and Win Elections louis c Apr 2019 #8

I agree with you. The House has a constitutional duty to impeach. Demit Apr 2019 #9

Very good point! Wish I had made it... CTyankee Apr 2019 #41

No, it doesn't. LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #46

I took an oath JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #13

God Bless You. louis c Apr 2019 #15

We wonder where we get a artislife Apr 2019 #17

Let's try to win an election, rather than to make a point. louis c Apr 2019 #19

Using this justification JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #22

or, you can get the votes from somwhere else and not be held hostage. louis c Apr 2019 #26

No to the "secondary to your cause" question artislife Apr 2019 #24

Good. Go out and get me 67 Senators who agree with you... louis c Apr 2019 #34

Somehow I am the lynchpin to this mess artislife Apr 2019 #36

You are wrong... louis c Apr 2019 #42

+∞ LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #43

What does +00 mean? louis c Apr 2019 #44

That's "plus infinity" LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #45

OK. Thanks. louis c Apr 2019 #47

I agree with you 100%, and I'll be quoting your "three word summary" in the future LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #48

Congress is not obligated in any way; it is solely the discretion of the House LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #21

This is not Bill Clinton JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #23

I remember watching the watergate hearings against Nixon, I also remember the damage it did to him & yaesu Apr 2019 #28

You can have the hearings without calling it impeachment. louis c Apr 2019 #31

the powers of oversight are very limited yaesu Apr 2019 #49

There are not even... Mike Nelson Apr 2019 #30

I think it's a bit early to start counting votes Bradshaw3 Apr 2019 #32

we can walk and chew gum at the same time shanny Apr 2019 #35

As long as we stay focused on getting Trump out of office... louis c Apr 2019 #37

This isn't a criminal case, and tRump isn't the only problem. shanny Apr 2019 #38

We can do that with impeachment. Oversight accomplishes that... louis c Apr 2019 #39

Also, what put these people in a "position to do it" was losing an election louis c Apr 2019 #40

Not "an" election. Many elections. And why is that, exactly? shanny Apr 2019 #50

Are you sure that Mueller will back us up if and when he testifies? louis c Apr 2019 #55

who the eff cares about what Mueller says, personally? shanny Apr 2019 #56

Try moving forward with affirmative public opinion and 67 Senators without Mueller. louis c Apr 2019 #57

I tend to agree with you. David__77 Apr 2019 #51

It's a political decision either way SHRED Apr 2019 #52

good points-but Russia is still corrupting our vote delisen Apr 2019 #53