Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

delisen

(7,349 posts)
53. good points-but Russia is still corrupting our vote
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 11:43 AM
Apr 2019

and the current recognized president is carrying out policies friendly to the very country corrupting our elections.

How long can we and our democracy last if we do not take action to remove or neuter the power of a president who is in the service of a determined and so far successful adversary.

One of the last actions of the Republican-controlled House was to remove sanctions against the Russian oligarch Deripaska so that a Russian beachhead could be established in the American state of Kentucky, controlled by Mitch McConnell, Russia is poised to benefit economically from from the building a wall we don't want and don't need- a wall designed to cut us off from our neighbor Mexico.

Think about the walls Soviet Russia built around eastern European countries and how they came suffer and decline through the Cold War era.

If Russia had come in with weapons and bombs to build a wall between the US and Mexico and the Republican-controlled senate did not declare war on Russia and fight back-what we we do?

Our first task while deciding about a course of action in this undeclared war is to acknowledge that we are already in one.

Most of our current crop of candidates have yet addressed the war-and the clock is ticking.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Or, let's force a vote and see where your Senator running for re-election stands on the rule of law PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #1
There are no more than 2 or 3 Republicans at risk louis c Apr 2019 #2
Don't you think there would be more Republicans at risk if people saw their Senator would not... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #4
Not in the states I listed here and where the Senator is in his term of office. louis c Apr 2019 #6
there are more than that, especially if certain people run Celerity Apr 2019 #29
there best shot at losing those seats is to vote for conviction louis c Apr 2019 #33
Its the right thing to do JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #3
Tell'em Elizabeth! PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #5
How many virtuos arguments have been made at the Supreme Court in the past 4 years... louis c Apr 2019 #7
True JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #10
Please click on this link and tell me who the 67 votes are louis c Apr 2019 #11
I dont care JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #12
Well, that's where we differ. I do care. louis c Apr 2019 #14
Im also JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #16
Trying and failing certainly doesn't strengthen our hand louis c Apr 2019 #18
None taken JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #20
Just a little background, then, on me... louis c Apr 2019 #25
Joe Biden JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #27
Until you address Russia, you will not weaken the enemy. delisen Apr 2019 #54
Count Votes and Win Elections louis c Apr 2019 #8
I agree with you. The House has a constitutional duty to impeach. Demit Apr 2019 #9
Very good point! Wish I had made it... CTyankee Apr 2019 #41
No, it doesn't. LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #46
I took an oath JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #13
God Bless You. louis c Apr 2019 #15
We wonder where we get a artislife Apr 2019 #17
Let's try to win an election, rather than to make a point. louis c Apr 2019 #19
Using this justification JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #22
or, you can get the votes from somwhere else and not be held hostage. louis c Apr 2019 #26
No to the "secondary to your cause" question artislife Apr 2019 #24
Good. Go out and get me 67 Senators who agree with you... louis c Apr 2019 #34
Somehow I am the lynchpin to this mess artislife Apr 2019 #36
You are wrong... louis c Apr 2019 #42
+∞ LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #43
What does +00 mean? louis c Apr 2019 #44
That's "plus infinity" LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #45
OK. Thanks. louis c Apr 2019 #47
I agree with you 100%, and I'll be quoting your "three word summary" in the future LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #48
Congress is not obligated in any way; it is solely the discretion of the House LongtimeAZDem Apr 2019 #21
This is not Bill Clinton JennyMominFL Apr 2019 #23
I remember watching the watergate hearings against Nixon, I also remember the damage it did to him & yaesu Apr 2019 #28
You can have the hearings without calling it impeachment. louis c Apr 2019 #31
the powers of oversight are very limited yaesu Apr 2019 #49
There are not even... Mike Nelson Apr 2019 #30
I think it's a bit early to start counting votes Bradshaw3 Apr 2019 #32
we can walk and chew gum at the same time shanny Apr 2019 #35
As long as we stay focused on getting Trump out of office... louis c Apr 2019 #37
This isn't a criminal case, and tRump isn't the only problem. shanny Apr 2019 #38
We can do that with impeachment. Oversight accomplishes that... louis c Apr 2019 #39
Also, what put these people in a "position to do it" was losing an election louis c Apr 2019 #40
Not "an" election. Many elections. And why is that, exactly? shanny Apr 2019 #50
Are you sure that Mueller will back us up if and when he testifies? louis c Apr 2019 #55
who the eff cares about what Mueller says, personally? shanny Apr 2019 #56
Try moving forward with affirmative public opinion and 67 Senators without Mueller. louis c Apr 2019 #57
I tend to agree with you. David__77 Apr 2019 #51
It's a political decision either way SHRED Apr 2019 #52
good points-but Russia is still corrupting our vote delisen Apr 2019 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»A Question for Elizabeth ...»Reply #53