Message auto-removed

[mr_lebowski]

70. I pointed out her minor mistake, that's not the same as 'being on your (personal) side'

Facts are facts, they don't really have a 'side'.

I appreciate adhering properly to logical constructs, but to be honest ... this is a social forum, and showing up like a bull in a china shop, being all 'Mr. Logic' ... isn't going to cause many to warm up to you much. Just my $.02, FWIW.

Anyone who joins and basically immediately begins posting divisive articles, whether they're 'right' or not, whether they're 'mainstream sources', or not? Doesn't much matter. It implies an intent, a 'mission' if you will.

There's only a few people the large majority of us 'trust' implicitly ... there's other members we KNOW here, some of these relationships going back almost 20 years now ... and it's people like Barack and Michelle, Hill and Bill, James Hansen, Noam Chomsky, Rachel, Lawrence O' Donnell, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert ... I'm sure there's many others, but I promise you ... 'random CNBC article writer' and 'Bilirubin' ... sure as shit ain't on the list.

Here's "logic" for you. It's not hard for a Writer to come up with a few friggin' people on the street who think "Man, That Mayor Ain't Done Nothing For Me!". And the fact you felt the need to join, and immediately post an article of this nature ... why, of COURSE, that doesn't mean YOU ARE a troll ... but it might.

ANd if you do something similar TWICE in a short period ... the numbers start stacking up against you. You're familiar with the concept of 'probabilities', right?