Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)We Asked Democratic Activists Who They're Backing -- And Who They'd Hate To See Win [View all]
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/we-asked-democratic-activists-who-theyre-backing-and-who-theyd-hate-to-see-win/Were still months away from the first nominating contest in Iowa, but Im still regularly checking in with early-state Democratic Party activists to see what the partys most engaged members think about the pre-primary race so far. In this installment, more activists are saying they have chosen a candidate to support, and some are now considering candidates who were previously flying under the radar. Were also getting a better sense of some of the divisions within the party by asking activists who they wont support.
As part of my ongoing book research, Ive been in touch with roughly 60 Democratic activists in New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina, Nevada and Washington, D.C.,1 asking them about their preferences for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. About 35 people from the respondent pool participated in each wave of interviews. Im interested in learning about whether these activists are committed to a candidate or whom theyre considering if they still havent made up their mind.
This time around, I also asked respondents who they didnt want as the nominee. After all, when a party is deciding between candidates, it needs to decide not only who is broadly liked, but also who is considered unacceptable by many factions within the party. Im trying to get a sense of which candidates look like traditional party nominees (broadly, if not enthusiastically, accepted by most wings of the party) and which look like factional candidates (the enthusiastic choice of some segments of the party but highly problematic for others).
At this stage, most of the activists I spoke to are considering at least a few candidates, but I did see a modest increase in the number committed to just one candidate: the total whod made up their mind jumped from nine in February to 11 in April. (Since each wave of interviews has gotten responses from a different subset of respondents, its important to keep in mind that some of these shifts may reflect changes in the respondent pool rather than changes in opinion.) Among the group of activists whove decided on one candidate, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was tied for the lead, with four activists backing him, essentially unchanged from the previous round of interviews.2 New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who now shares the lead, went from one declared supporter in February to four in April. And still-undeclared candidate former Vice President Joe Biden actually lost at least one supporter.3 A woman who had been backing Biden told me that her concerns over his unwanted touching of women caused her to re-evaluate her decision. While she said that she is still considering Biden, she is now considering other candidates too.
snip


primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Asked Democratic Activists Who They're Backing -- And Who They'd Hate To See Win [View all]
Celerity
Apr 2019
OP
I agree,and very happy to see my top 4 candidates are also top 4 there too (Stacey Abrams rounds out
Celerity
Apr 2019
#3
I cant seem to find who these activists are. Is there information on who somewhere.
Nanjeanne
Apr 2019
#2
Thanks. But not good enough to me to take this as serious research. Means nothing without knowing
Nanjeanne
Apr 2019
#7
I'd at least like the ground rules for who qualifies as an "activist"
Algernon Moncrieff
Apr 2019
#15
Thanks. Not that interested. It's a comment on a meaningless poll. Anonymous is one
Nanjeanne
Apr 2019
#10
I think it has some validity due to the fluidity, as it shows they're not locked in to one candidate
Celerity
Apr 2019
#11
My point is this is a poll of 35 People. To headline it ACTIVISTS as if that means something
Nanjeanne
Apr 2019
#13