Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Celerity

(54,892 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 08:47 AM Apr 2019

We Asked Democratic Activists Who They're Backing -- And Who They'd Hate To See Win [View all]

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/we-asked-democratic-activists-who-theyre-backing-and-who-theyd-hate-to-see-win/

We’re still months away from the first nominating contest in Iowa, but I’m still regularly checking in with early-state Democratic Party activists to see what the party’s most engaged members think about the pre-primary race so far. In this installment, more activists are saying they have chosen a candidate to support, and some are now considering candidates who were previously flying under the radar. We’re also getting a better sense of some of the divisions within the party by asking activists who they won’t support.

As part of my ongoing book research, I’ve been in touch with roughly 60 Democratic activists in New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina, Nevada and Washington, D.C.,1 asking them about their preferences for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. About 35 people from the respondent pool participated in each wave of interviews. I’m interested in learning about whether these activists are committed to a candidate or whom they’re considering if they still haven’t made up their mind.

This time around, I also asked respondents who they didn’t want as the nominee. After all, when a party is deciding between candidates, it needs to decide not only who is broadly liked, but also who is considered unacceptable by many factions within the party. I’m trying to get a sense of which candidates look like traditional party nominees (broadly, if not enthusiastically, accepted by most wings of the party) and which look like factional candidates (the enthusiastic choice of some segments of the party but highly problematic for others).

At this stage, most of the activists I spoke to are considering at least a few candidates, but I did see a modest increase in the number committed to just one candidate: the total who’d made up their mind jumped from nine in February to 11 in April. (Since each wave of interviews has gotten responses from a different subset of respondents, it’s important to keep in mind that some of these shifts may reflect changes in the respondent pool rather than changes in opinion.) Among the group of activists who’ve decided on one candidate, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was tied for the lead, with four activists backing him, essentially unchanged from the previous round of interviews.2 New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who now shares the lead, went from one declared supporter in February to four in April. And still-undeclared candidate former Vice President Joe Biden actually lost at least one supporter.3 A woman who had been backing Biden told me that her concerns over his unwanted touching of women caused her to re-evaluate her decision. While she said that she is still considering Biden, she is now considering other candidates too.

snip



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The enthusiasm of Democratic activist is something we can't afford to ignore. DCofVA Apr 2019 #1
I agree,and very happy to see my top 4 candidates are also top 4 there too (Stacey Abrams rounds out Celerity Apr 2019 #3
The stolid commitment of the typical quiet Democrat Hortensis Apr 2019 #6
I cant seem to find who these activists are. Is there information on who somewhere. Nanjeanne Apr 2019 #2
I believe this is as far as they have gone in defining that. WeekiWater Apr 2019 #5
Thanks. But not good enough to me to take this as serious research. Means nothing without knowing Nanjeanne Apr 2019 #7
I agree. NT WeekiWater Apr 2019 #8
I'd at least like the ground rules for who qualifies as an "activist" Algernon Moncrieff Apr 2019 #15
you could ask the author, I am under the impression it is done anonymously Celerity Apr 2019 #9
Thanks. Not that interested. It's a comment on a meaningless poll. Anonymous is one Nanjeanne Apr 2019 #10
I think it has some validity due to the fluidity, as it shows they're not locked in to one candidate Celerity Apr 2019 #11
My point is this is a poll of 35 People. To headline it ACTIVISTS as if that means something Nanjeanne Apr 2019 #13
A whole 35 respondents. Lol. We have almost as many candidates. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #12
it was never adverted as a national survey, it only focused on a few small but influential (early Celerity Apr 2019 #14
Fascinating. Thanks for posting this. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #4
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»We Asked Democratic Activ...»Reply #0