Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Will the Revolution Be Monetized? Bernie Sanders' 'Dark Money' Org [View all]lapucelle
(21,319 posts)27. It's the very definition of dark money.
501(c)(4): Also known as dark money groups, these make up some of the most relevant political nonprofits today. Technically deemed social welfare organizations, these groups cant have political activity such as making ads advocating for or against candidates as their primary purpose; this has unofficially been interpreted to mean they must spend less than 50 percent of their activities on politics or elections. But they can raise unlimited amounts of cash from individuals and organizations alike without having to disclose who contributed that money. Heres a disclosure form for Crossroads GPS, a conservative 501(c)(4) that spent more than $120 million on the 2012 elections note the $22.5 million donation with no name attached. One thing to keep in mind when trying to track the political activity of these groups: (c)(4)s that spend money directly advocating for or against a candidate (an independent expenditure) or make electioneering communications must report that to the FEC.
Despite the unwritten rules, many 501(c)(4)s do engage in significant political activity, and since the Tea Party targeting scandal a few years ago, the IRS has been very timid about regulating this; in 2016, they are expressly forbidden from issuing new rules on political activity that would enable them to regulate it. To determine which activities constitute social welfare, the FEC has little guidelines and will only look at each case on an individual basis.
A common practice in the post-Citizens United world is to link a 501(c)(4) to an affiliated super PAC. This allows the super PAC to receive unlimited amounts of money without the true donor being revealed. They also can share staff and other resources, like American Bridge 21st Century and American Bridge 21st Century Foundation, a liberal super PAC and its affiliated 501(c)(4), respectively.
Despite the unwritten rules, many 501(c)(4)s do engage in significant political activity, and since the Tea Party targeting scandal a few years ago, the IRS has been very timid about regulating this; in 2016, they are expressly forbidden from issuing new rules on political activity that would enable them to regulate it. To determine which activities constitute social welfare, the FEC has little guidelines and will only look at each case on an individual basis.
A common practice in the post-Citizens United world is to link a 501(c)(4) to an affiliated super PAC. This allows the super PAC to receive unlimited amounts of money without the true donor being revealed. They also can share staff and other resources, like American Bridge 21st Century and American Bridge 21st Century Foundation, a liberal super PAC and its affiliated 501(c)(4), respectively.
https://sunlightfoundation.com/2016/02/17/a-glossary-of-campaign-finance-in-the-u-s/#501(c)(4)
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, unless OR makes it's donor lists public, attacks on Biden's donors are moot.
LongtimeAZDem
Apr 2019
#4
They don't give the amounts that each has contributed. Interestingly a quick rundown of the list...
George II
Apr 2019
#29
Interestingly, Rove's Crossroads GPS ran some anti-Hillary ads in some very targeted
ehrnst
Apr 2019
#35
I need to time to read but it looks there are $$ from a Nurses Union and some progressive PAC with
CentralMass
Apr 2019
#25
After rezding thae articld more i think that it a well written and honest article
CentralMass
Apr 2019
#37
If a PAC participates in political activity but doesn't reveal the sources....
George II
Apr 2019
#41
Some candidates like to blur the line between donor count and donation count, hoping...
George II
Apr 2019
#44
Do you know anything about Good Jobs Nation's connection to Our Revolution? N/T
lapucelle
Apr 2019
#45
My understanding is that there is a "dotted line" relationship between Our Revolution...
George II
Apr 2019
#46
It also may be a violation of Federal Law on the part of Our Revolution, a 501(c)(4) committee...
George II
Apr 2019
#60
Even if it's not "against the law" (it probably is), it is proof that Sanders is accepting.....
George II
May 2019
#72
Hasn't it already been monetized with those stellar book sales? I'm surprised Bernie didn't put
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#36
It's hard tellin' how much the 'free' help that Bernie got from Russia was worth.
bloom
Apr 2019
#38
"I find this whole virtue signaling around corporate donations and no PACs to be ridiculous as.."
Cha
Apr 2019
#62
Deep dive into how Bernie Sanders' 2020 campaign is benefitting from political infrastructure
Gothmog
May 2019
#75
So, in other words, he DOES accept money from Super PACs and organizations accepting "dark money".
George II
May 2019
#79