Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
35. Except this seems to be a recurring theme, and it always is from the same groups. It doesn't matter what
Wed May 8, 2024, 05:47 PM
May 2024

the survivors, the hostages that were released said, or the videos taken by the terrorists and photos from others indicated.

I call on DN to back up their reporting.

DN is a propaganda outlet.

Anyone can call themselves a “journalist”. Fox News regurgitates a lot them, so does Russia and China, DN claims Julian Assaign is a journalist


Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What dumbasses. nocoincidences May 2024 #1
Calling the survivors and victims liars is a disgrace is despicable. It only highlights what an hamas JohnSJ May 2024 #2
I call it "We Hate Democracy Now!" madaboutharry May 2024 #7
+++ JohnSJ May 2024 #8
What's wrong with an investigation? If you want the truth to come out, I see nothing wrong with it. TeamProg May 2024 #12
Simple question. revmclaren May 2024 #14
It's not the "women" who would be investigated, it's the facts behind the STORIES. See the difference? TeamProg May 2024 #17
Rape is rape. revmclaren May 2024 #20
#ME TOO UNLESS YOU'RE A JEW. madaboutharry May 2024 #16
yup Behind the Aegis May 2024 #29
It would be worthwhile to investigate and for the NYT to substantiate their sources... Chakaconcarne May 2024 #22
+++ TeamProg May 2024 #25
It is shameful to assert there are no sources for this, after a mountain of evidence has been compiled. SunSeeker May 2024 #37
Here's an hour's worth of sources for you. SunSeeker May 2024 #36
That publication is pro-third party spoiler and always has been. mzmolly May 2024 #18
The paper of 'record' :-/ Jim_S May 2024 #24
I've seen enough of their videos mzmolly May 2024 #40
I call it "Democracy? NO!" Behind the Aegis May 2024 #30
Theocracy Now! shilling for authoritarian, extreme right wing religious fanatics. lapucelle May 2024 #31
Does this involve the question 'what were they wearing?' mzmolly May 2024 #3
Oh, the irony. TwilightZone May 2024 #4
Have they ever interviewed an opposing point of view? JohnSJ May 2024 #6
Screams followed by silence JohnSJ May 2024 #5
Thank you for the link. revmclaren May 2024 #10
It is disgraceful. JohnSJ May 2024 #11
Wow. Thanks for posting that link. Hamas must be removed from the planet. SunSeeker May 2024 #33
So they want us to believe that HAMAS Progressive dog May 2024 #9
This is foul mcar May 2024 #13
Are you saying the article is "fact"? JohnSJ May 2024 #19
No, Hamas' brutality is fact mcar May 2024 #26
The NYT article documents facts mcar May 2024 #27
Thanks mcar. That is what I thought. Appreciate the clarification. JohnSJ May 2024 #28
Funny how they never mention the livestreams and videos Hamas made of their actions sarisataka May 2024 #15
So, they don't deny Hamas raped civilians, they're quibbling over what "mass" means! SunSeeker May 2024 #21
I used to like some of democracy now, those days are long gone. BoomaofBandM May 2024 #23
DN is questioning the NYT reporting, which people here on DU do all the friggin' time Chakaconcarne May 2024 #32
There is PLENTY of back up. SunSeeker May 2024 #34
Except this seems to be a recurring theme, and it always is from the same groups. It doesn't matter what JohnSJ May 2024 #35
As a side note, the rec list just keeps on growing revmclaren May 2024 #38
I noticed, and that in itself speaks volumes JohnSJ May 2024 #39
I asked a question on a new Democracy Now revmclaren May 2024 #45
I posted an answer to you, didn't you read it? n/t Uncle Joe May 2024 #46
And I responded. revmclaren May 2024 #47
Post away. Uncle Joe May 2024 #48
Someone stating they are independent, does not mean they are objective. The only thing "independent" JohnSJ May 2024 #49
I haven't found an instance. And im surfing through various archives. revmclaren May 2024 #50
Having an independent investigation should not be unthinkable ... cliffside May 2024 #41
Why don't these 60 journalists investigate it themselves? SunSeeker May 2024 #42
These "journalism professors" are disgusting. That's not journalism. betsuni May 2024 #43
Suspicion of women reporting en masse about rape. But of course. Malmsy May 2024 #44
Wow! Where did the find 60+ Anti-Semite journalism professors? Chainfire May 2024 #51
Those 60 "journalism professors" did not review the evidence of Hamas systematic rape. SunSeeker May 2024 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»60+ Journalism Profs Dema...»Reply #35