Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,445 posts)
3. I don't hink it's serious
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 06:01 PM
Saturday

Well, not the bit about going after Greenland and taking it away from Denmark.

I think it's about drawing European forces far enough away to give Putin a clear shot at the Baltics.

I just hope France, Germany and Sweden are also playing Rope A Dope and will send those troops to where they can easily curb stomp any Russians who try to invade.

In any case, there is another part of the constitution Belle neglected to point out: Article II (that's TWO, BTW), Section 2, Paragraph ii, which clearly states how treaties are made and that they have the force of Federal law once negotiated by the Executive and ratified by the Senate. There is a pesky 1906 treaty that gives up all US claims to Greenland. It's quite specific in that regard.

Now if Fatso want to set aside that treaty, he need to go to the Senate. If not, this is egregious enough that he should be removed immediately. And if not, a military takeover until 2028 is looking better and better.

Besides, I think that fat fool's real target is Mexico. They've got oil reserves, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Let's talk about Trump's ...»Reply #3