General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Bible Tells Us When A Fetus Becomes A Living Being
The Bible Tells Us When A Fetus Becomes A Living Being
Many people think that a human being is created at the time of conception but this belief is not supported by the bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a living human being. According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.
After God formed man in Genesis 2, He breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and it was then that the man became a living being. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not a living being until after taking his first breath.
In Job 33:4, it states: The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.
Again, to quote Ezekiel 37:5&6, Thus says the Lord God to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord.
In Exodus 21:22 it states that if a man causes a woman to have a miscarriage, he shall be fined; however, if the woman dies then he will be put to death. It should be apparent from this that the aborted fetus is not considered a living human being since the resulting punishment for the abortion is nothing more than a fine; it is not classified by the bible as a capital offense.
According to the bible, destroying a living fetus does not equate to killing a living human being even though the fetus has the potential of becoming a human being. One can not kill something that has not been born and taken a breath. This means that a stillborn would not be considered a human being either. Of course, every living sperm has the potential of becoming a human being although not one in a million will make it; the rest are aborted.
- Found in archives. Best abortion argument I could find here at DU. Originally posted by "Itchingcarpenter".
Ocelot II
(130,264 posts)erronis
(23,615 posts)I'm not sure I can come up with a good example of foods made out of pollen (sperm) but I had to look it up. Not much.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollen#In_humans
mainer
(12,544 posts)Its called miscarriage and it ends the lives of about 1 in three embryos. God is the primary abortionist.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)I guess if you accpet that God is in control then it would be God's abortion of "babies".
If you believe in nature, then it's just nature in control.
mainer
(12,544 posts)Starting at conception.
Estimates vary because many conception failures happen without the woman even being aware she conceived. Range of estimates is somewhere between 15% to 50%:
As many as half of all pregnancies may end in miscarriage. We dont know the exact number because a miscarriage may happen before a woman knows shes pregnant. Most women who miscarry go on to have a healthy pregnancy later. (March of Dimes)
If religious fundies want to throw their God at us in their argument against abortion rights, just ask them why, if God believes life starts at conception, God kills so many babies.
Girard442
(6,872 posts)Evolve Dammit
(21,742 posts)"take issue" with that bullshit.
Girard442
(6,872 posts)The point being that those people think that tossing off a glib and facile quip completely disposes of the issue.
Evolve Dammit
(21,742 posts)calimary
(89,816 posts)In Catholic school I was taught that no one may know the Mind of God.
Who the hell are these people to declare who has a soul and who doesnt?
Maybe THEYRE the soulless ones.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Hundreds of millions of human eggs, maybe billions, are removed every single month.
And the sperm? They can even swim! Yet, millions and millions are lost every single day. No one even cares about them, or tries to regulate their development or removal.
Sorry, Im in a real snarky mood about the issue today.
hedda_foil
(16,982 posts)One egg, and very occasionally two are released each month. A woman is born with the total number of egg cells she will ever have.
At birth, there are approximately 1 million eggs; and by the time of puberty, only about 300,000 remain. Of these, only 300 to 400 will be ovulated during a woman's reproductive lifetime.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/9118-female-reproductive-system#:~:text=At%20birth%2C%20there%20are%20approximately,during%20a%20woman's%20reproductive%20lifetime.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(13,287 posts)Elle: For that matter, any masturbatory emissions, where the sperm is clearly not seeking an egg, could be termed reckless abandonment."
Professor Callahan: "Youve just won your case.
erronis
(23,615 posts)and making it out into the raw world, fighting against all those other zygotes. Most of which end up flushed down the toilet.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Therefore, hundreds of millions gone every month.
Happy Hoosier
(9,520 posts)If you count fertilized zygotes that never implant.
evolves
(5,825 posts)Actually, the percentage of fertilized eggs that never implant is estimated to be about 70%.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,369 posts)non-procreative sex by forcing them to give birth (or die/damage their health trying to).
mopinko
(73,626 posts)outdated. breath was long the marker of life, but in this modern world, it's brain activity.
but we dont know enough about fetal brain activity to move that marker now. they are trying, tho.
that's why they made up the whole 'fetal pain' thing.
but from the standpoint of- 'you are using this book to defend you stance', you are dead on.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)The two are antithetical, anyway.
i'm just pointing out that tho their book hasnt changed, their arguments have.
multigraincracker
(37,461 posts)a transgender clone.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)
toon
uponit7771
(93,528 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)the Bible says, and you'd better jump to it.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)RussBLib
(10,582 posts)most GOP have long since discarded the moral tenets from the bible, if they were ever even aware of them in the first place
then many turn right around and say every word in that goatherders guide to the galaxy is the truth, and wear their piousness on their sleeves
hypocritical motherfuckers
ms liberty
(11,180 posts)Good on you for finding this post!
Happy Hoosier
(9,520 posts)I could not care less what some religious text says in the matter. We should not be using ancient religions as a basis for our government.
And thank you very much!
RANDYWILDMAN
(3,159 posts)and that's all it's ever been about.
I told my 73 mother this other and she lost her stuff, thought about it or a few days and came and said damn, I agree.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,849 posts)Fla Dem
(27,574 posts).
multigraincracker
(37,461 posts)the loop hole.
Lonestarblue
(13,451 posts)the basis for the evangelical religion is the New Testament, none of which was written contemporaneously while Jesus was living and his words could be recorded and quoted. At the earliest, books in the New Testament have been dated to having been written 50-60 years AD. I remember a lot from 50 years ago, but there is no way I could accurately quote statements I heard from then, which the Bible purports to do. While religious scholars would say that the words of the Bible were from divine inspiration, they were still written by men and were based as much on hearsay and the religious teachings of the day as on the actual words of Jesus. Just my belief, anyway.
As for the Old Testament, written much earlier, much of it relied on oral tradition before religious scholars recorded it in writing. And as anyone who has ever played the telephone game, the accuracy of oral retellings becomes quite suspect.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)made it clear that you must be BORN (not conceived) in the United States to be a citizen.
mjvpi
(1,925 posts)Anchor zygote
crickets
(26,168 posts)meadowlander
(5,121 posts)Technically fetuses do "breath" amniotic fluid to help build up the strength in their lungs.
You can't reason with someone determined not to see reason because it's a political cash cow when they are prepared to draw arguments from whatever is most convenient to back their preconceived narrative.
Bev54
(13,407 posts)legal or political decisions should ever be made because of the "Bible"
IbogaProject
(5,814 posts)I'm in favor of their ability to picket. Although I don't like it, I feel the first amendment gives them a right to make their case. And we can make the case that rape, child and incest pregnancies should be terminated.
Response to IbogaProject (Reply #28)
Six117 This message was self-deleted by its author.
FakeNoose
(41,284 posts)The baby's soul enters its body when the baby takes its first breath. Before a live birth, there is no human soul in the fetus. The baby become a human being when its soul enters with the drawing of the first breath.
I think that concept is clearly stated in the Genesis passage. It is also a core belief of many spiritual, psychic and religious groups in the US and elsewhere. It has been wrong of the Catholic Church to deliberately twist this teaching into controlling the power of women, but that's what they've done for over a thousand years.
paleotn
(22,090 posts)the female reproductive system is the greatest mass murderer of all time. Fetuses abort for reasons or sometimes no apparent reasons at all. It just happens. God, I despise religious types trying to mold their bronze and iron age myths around things they knew nothing about at the time the myths were dreamed up.
KentuckyWoman
(7,397 posts)Outside of that, anyone reading the Old Testament and still claims God is "pro life" is not being honest.
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)Yes, at conception the entity is a genetically complete human organism.
It isnt granted legal personhood until it is born alive.
twodogsbarking
(18,475 posts)Iggo
(49,884 posts)halfulglas
(1,654 posts)In most societies on the planet personhood begins at first breath. It was the Christian religions for the most part that instituted this because of politics. Even in the early Christian church abortion and killing of the fetus isn't mentioned. Only much later when men were exerting more control over property rights, etc. it became important to control who inherits what it became more important to control the women.
mike_c
(37,026 posts)Life on Earth began some 2 billion-ish years ago and has continued in an unbroken chain ever since. Human life evolved some hundreds of thousands of years ago and has continued, unbroken, ever since, at least for H. sapiens' lineage. Life does not "begin" during any portion of modern human life history. Anything else is just semantics and religious nonsense.
"The Bible Tells Us When A Fetus Becomes A Living Being." That's a bunch of hooey on first principles. No human fetus (or any other kind) is ever anything but a living being. The gametes that join to produce a zygote are just as alive as any other cells in our bodies.
Are fetuses "persons?" What else can they be? What rational definition of personhood excludes the developmental stages common to all persons since the very evolution of human personhood? They are the roots of human identity. If they're not persons, what are they? We can't simply define them by what they're not. If they're not persons then they must be something else. What's the difference between a human person and a human non-person? If the answer is framed simply, in terms of fetal viability, then the boundaries of personhood are fluid, and beginning earlier and earlier with the advent of modern neonatal care. Is a premie in the NICU a person before a fetus carried to full term? Do dead people cease being human when they no longer draw breath?
This is not justification for dictating women's reproductive choices. However, any religious claptrap that seeks to define the origins of human life in modern times is just butt ignorant superstition.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)those who use religion / God as a reason to control women.
IMHO - Religion is superstition and therefore a form of mental illness.
roamer65
(37,902 posts)Their body, their choice.
The goal of the mainly white fundamentalist cultists is to force the birth of white babies in order to maintain the dominance of the white race.
Just like Hitler did in Nazi Germany.
Retrograde
(11,415 posts)is that you can pick and choose which parts support your viewpoint. Aside from the Old Testament vs New Testament debates, you can also argue the Catholic version vs the more mainstream Protestant versions - and I'm not even thinking about the other apochrypha. Then there's the whole business of which translation to trust - it'd be a lot of fun were it not literally a matter of life and death for some people.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.
'God's word' becomes irrelevant when it's inconvenient.
-------------
The Bible Tells Us When A Fetus Becomes A Living Being
https://democraticunderground.com/100216116358