The bare bones of Ramaswamy's new biotech venture, Axovant ($AXON), are much discussed these days. The former hedge fund manager grabbed an abandoned GlaxoSmithKline drug for Alzheimer's for $5 million. He gathered a team together and without recruiting a single patient for a pivotal study of a marginal drug designed to treat symptoms of the disease, just raised $315 million in an upsized IPO that came in at the top of the range and promptly gyrated much higher today as investors bought in.

Axovant, with no track record, no experience and one questionable product, leaped onto the market worth much more than $1 billion.

Given the fact that GlaxoSmithKline had a chance to take a look at this drug in the clinic, and concluded that they couldn't do better than selling it for lunch money, the IPO terms illustrate the kind of overnight riches a select few can find on Wall Street, provided you have the right kind of friends with money.

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (KPEL News) -The University of North Carolina is under lockdown after a suspect opened fire on campus. The person of interest, according to media reports, is a current graduate student at the university but has ties to Louisiana.

Tailei Qi, the UNC graduate student, was identified as a person of interest by UNC police. According to WRAL in Raliegh, he is also listed on a UNC website as having previously attended Louisiana State University and Wuhan University.

On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. Five of the defendants have filed notices of removal to have the case transferred from Georgia state court to federal court.[1] Defendants bear the burden to show they are federal officers (three of the five do not appear to have been), that the conduct was plausibly official and that they have a plausible defense based in federal law. The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. Among the results of a successful removal to federal court is a different jury pool, a different judge, and different procedural rules such as the absence of video cameras in federal trials.

This article provides detailed information about all that and other general and specific questions involving removal.

We welcome readers’ feedback and additional information

Table of Contents

GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT REMOVAL
What is the basis for removing a state prosecution to federal court?
What is the reason behind removal?
What is the legal standard for removal?
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD
Who counts as an officer of the United States?
What constitutes “for or relating to any act under color of such office”?
What constitutes a “colorable federal defense?”
What’s the difference between the legal standard to establish removal and immunity?
Does the fact that a defendant was involved in political activity using campaign funds affect the analysis?
Can a defendant have a removable colorable defense when accused of obstruction of justice or perjury?
REMOVAL PROCEDURE
What is the process for removal?
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures?
What is the evidentiary standard in a removal hearing?
What evidentiary rules apply in a removal hearing?
What is the difference between the standard for removing a case based on the Supremacy Clause immunity and succeeding at asserting the immunity?
HOW DOES A DEFENDANT ESTABLISH REMOVAL IS WARRANTED?
Must a defendant admit the conduct in question to establish an immunity defense?
How does a defendant establish a colorable defense?
Practically speaking, how does a defendant meet their burden of proof? Must they testify?
If a defendant invokes their Fifth Amendment right, is the court able to draw any adverse inference?
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE CASE IS REMOVED?
What happens if the case is removed based on Supremacy Clause immunity?
If one defendant is removed to federal court, are the other defendants also removed?
What happens to DA Willis and her team if the case is removed?
What rules and laws apply for a case that has been removed?
Can the decision to grant removal or grant remand be appealed?
If the case is removed, which Speedy Trial Act would govern–state or federal?

A White gunman who opened fire in a Jacksonville Dollar General store, killing three Black people in what law enforcement called a racially motivated attack, first tried to enter the campus of nearby historically Black college but was turned away, according to a notice from the school.

The man, identified on Sunday as 21-year-old Ryan Christopher Palmeter from Clay County, Fla., was denied entry to Edward Waters University by a security officer, and local law enforcement was alerted. “The individual refused to identify themselves and was asked to leave,” said the statement, adding that the person “returned to his car without incident.”

Palmeter donned a bulletproof vest and mask before heading to the Dollar General store less than a mile away and opening fire, Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters (R) said in an interview on CNN on Saturday. Armed with an AR-15-type rifle inscribed with German Nazi insignia and a handgun, he killed two male victims, ages 19 and 29, inside the store, and one female victim, age 52, in the car park outside at the store before fatally shooting himself