Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

awesomerwb1

(4,256 posts)
31. Steyer would probably love to
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 12:42 PM
Dec 2017

fund ads for Dems don't you think?

Dems need to get very creative and more vocal on social media which is a war the russian Republicans and russian bots appear to be winning.

Excellent and disturbing question. Golden Raisin Dec 2017 #1
And it was answered... DemocracyMouse Dec 2017 #30
Why do people think that Democratic politics means putting on tough talking TV shows? FSogol Dec 2017 #2
What do you mean by "tough talking TV show?" Doodley Dec 2017 #3
TV shows where people talk tough. emulatorloo Dec 2017 #7
"We should fix everything. That's what I would do!" FSogol Dec 2017 #9
It isn't about fixing everything. It is about ripping apart a bill that is going to be devastating Doodley Dec 2017 #23
Dem lawmakers are speaking out. They don't have big ad budgets like billionaire Steyer, and emulatorloo Dec 2017 #4
They don't need to speak out. They need to channel our anger out instead. Blue_Adept Dec 2017 #8
I hear frustration and anger from Dems as they speak out. emulatorloo Dec 2017 #11
How about Pelosi and Schumer TheCowsCameHome Dec 2017 #14
Yes, and they need to present ordinary people and talk about how they will be adversely Doodley Dec 2017 #20
They're still playing the same game. They're still playing at politics when much more is at stake. Blue_Adept Dec 2017 #16
Yes, passiveness is not a call to action or a vote winner. Doodley Dec 2017 #19
I'm glad too. Steyer was a major donor to Martin O'Malley's campaign. n/t FSogol Dec 2017 #10
Democrats can't find the money to run a campaign on the same scale as Tom Steyer? Doodley Dec 2017 #22
Steyer would probably love to awesomerwb1 Dec 2017 #31
Keeping their powder dry, TheCowsCameHome Dec 2017 #5
... emulatorloo Dec 2017 #6
Here's what I don't understand. HRC got over 65 millions votes underthematrix Dec 2017 #12
Most won't ever hear of it Blue_Adept Dec 2017 #18
No it's not meaningless. Twitler is a tv reality president. It will matter to him. It will phuck underthematrix Dec 2017 #25
It'll matter to him? He'll never even hear of it. Blue_Adept Dec 2017 #26
There's a tweet for that... PunkinPi Dec 2017 #28
Thanks for posting that. Yes, Trump takes note of all criticisms. Doodley Dec 2017 #33
You're welcome, that's one thing he is consistent on. nt PunkinPi Dec 2017 #34
Why haven't the Democrats flooded the news talk shows with surrogates speaking out against this tax world wide wally Dec 2017 #13
Wut? And alienate their (R) pals? TheCowsCameHome Dec 2017 #15
Exactly. Trump won because people believed (wrongly IMO) that he was passionate about Doodley Dec 2017 #17
By "doing" you mean "advocating a meaningless symbolic vote to make liberals feel good"? brooklynite Dec 2017 #21
This is about Steyer's attacks on the tax bill. Doodley Dec 2017 #24
And it would still be more useful for him Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2017 #27
Tell me the name of the website that appears in the ad brooklynite Dec 2017 #29
What website are you talking about? What is still his goal? Doodley Dec 2017 #32
Needtoimpeach.com brooklynite Dec 2017 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Tom Steyer doing w...»Reply #31