Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
15. So, you argue the War on Drugs is beneficial
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 11:04 AM
Jul 2012

Or is the solution to "a huge and deadly" problem made it worse?

Prohibition has a poor, poor history in this country.

If you want to "do something", how about reducing poverty and increasing affordable access to stigma free mental health with no gotchas like seeking help for your depression and ending up on a list that follows you around when you go to get a hunting rifle or a job or may end up being used against you in ads if you ran for office.

Of course often "doing something" is actually doing nothing and zealously pretending you did like the goofy ass assault weapons ban that played around with cosmetic features, I assume to annoy consumers, but otherwise would not impact the situations it was supposed to reduce.
There was a poster yesterday who wanted to "do something" by restricting the number of weapons a person may have on them but was unable to explain how this would make a massacre less likely to happen. There is no expectation that such an initiative would actually impact the situation used to justify it, the point cannot logically be to "do something" about the problem because there is no argument it does.

Nobody is going to ever, not once in a billion times, going to be like I was going to commit mass murder but the law says I can only carry one gun, whatever shall I do about this dilemma?

When efforts do little to nothing to resolve the problem but serve to hamper law abiding, tax paying citizen you force them to be less receptive and "reasonable" to your way of thinking.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Substitute heroin for guns [View all] mick063 Jul 2012 OP
Substitute a ham sandwich for a flight of stairs. MattBaggins Jul 2012 #1
Bombs don't kill people. Hugabear Jul 2012 #2
That's the difference sadbear Jul 2012 #5
Works for me. Webster Green Jul 2012 #3
The same can be said of a chair. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #4
I support the legalization of all drugs. Addiction is a public health issue, not a crime. nt hack89 Jul 2012 #6
Good points all. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #7
There's poster here that loves pit bulls and hates guns. Edweird Jul 2012 #8
So . . . would a ban on guns be as successful as our ban on most drugs? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #9
Ah yes... 99Forever Jul 2012 #10
More like "If you can't solve a relatively small problem do something to make it worse!" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #11
Yeah right... 99Forever Jul 2012 #12
Actually crime is down across the board 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #13
WTF? 99Forever Jul 2012 #16
Violent crime is on the decline 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #17
Nothing like using an unproven ... 99Forever Jul 2012 #19
Never said one caused the other 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #20
You insinuated it. 99Forever Jul 2012 #21
You inferred it 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #22
You brought up your canard, not me. 99Forever Jul 2012 #23
Canard, def: 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #24
So, you argue the War on Drugs is beneficial TheKentuckian Jul 2012 #15
What you said about going after poverty and mental illness, the root issues 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #18
The substitution doesn't work for me: Dr. Strange Jul 2012 #14
It's a poor analogy. rrneck Jul 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Substitute heroin for gun...»Reply #15