General Discussion

Poiuyt

(18,272 posts)

7. Does this mean that Cohen can restrict what the prosecutors can see?

Reply to oberliner (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2018, 05:39 PM

Apr 2018

And is Cohen getting the originals or copies?

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] oberliner Apr 2018 OP

This is Matthew28 Apr 2018 #1

That was my thought as well oberliner Apr 2018 #3

Cohen is Russian Mafia underpants Apr 2018 #5

Isnt this discovery? RandySF Apr 2018 #8

Where is our DU attorney??? Who cares that they get to REVIEW them as long as they Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #52

Make sure he doesn't have a lighter on him underpants Apr 2018 #2

Yup backtoblue Apr 2018 #49

You want it all "by-the-book" so that there can be no appeals, no spin, no belly-aching. lindysalsagal Apr 2018 #4

Oh, MY - heads spinning all the way off, people *caving*...? Leghorn21 Apr 2018 #51

That's a shame. I'm guessing most all of the documents won't see the light of day. AJT Apr 2018 #6

Does this mean that Cohen can restrict what the prosecutors can see? Poiuyt Apr 2018 #7

No RandySF Apr 2018 #9

No. Though it would be easy to conclude that from the OP. But no. Squinch Apr 2018 #53

Wait... the NYT doesn;t seem to agree.... Adrahil Apr 2018 #10

Was wondering about conflicting headlines. elleng Apr 2018 #13

From your link grantcart Apr 2018 #14

She also said she want things "moving along". triron Apr 2018 #17

Not consistent with this: triron Apr 2018 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author madaboutharry Apr 2018 #12

Newsweek needs to hire a more competent headline writer. madaboutharry Apr 2018 #15

There's maybe a problem with that reporting - NYT says the opposite TubbersUK Apr 2018 #16

This is from The Hill: "Judge rules Cohen can see seized documents before prosecutors" oberliner Apr 2018 #22

It is strange - perhaps an emphasis thing. n/t TubbersUK Apr 2018 #44

The Hill is wrong paleotn Apr 2018 #54

The Hill has sorted itself out a bit now TubbersUK Apr 2018 #63

Thanks for sharing that oberliner Apr 2018 #65

This story seems to have come out after the court hearing - seems coming out of asiliveandbreathe Apr 2018 #18

The way I understood it, is she probably will let a filter team go through and maybe a shraby Apr 2018 #19

I think not based on latest breaking news NRaleighLiberal Apr 2018 #20

Oops. Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #21

Kind of embarrassing for the NY Times to get this story wrong oberliner Apr 2018 #25

No they did not. madaboutharry Apr 2018 #28

Yes, they did oberliner Apr 2018 #29

That's completely contrary to your posted article's assertion. OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #34

They both say the same thing oberliner Apr 2018 #39

No they don't. OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #46

Yes, they do oberliner Apr 2018 #47

Good lord. OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #50

Seconded. Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #55

Here's CNN oberliner Apr 2018 #59

Yeah, I watched Lester Holt tonight. He says the same. Tipperary Apr 2018 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #23

How did you find this howler? OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #24

Huh? oberliner Apr 2018 #26

It's being MISreported by them. OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #30

It's the lead story on Newsweek's home page oberliner Apr 2018 #32

It wasn't when you posted this OP. OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #38

It is now oberliner Apr 2018 #40

No.... chillfactor Apr 2018 #27

It's not an error oberliner Apr 2018 #31

Sounds fair enough Sanity Claws Apr 2018 #33

They are his documents. Seems like he would have already reviewed them. Lint Head Apr 2018 #35

Hey now, the guys been busy, Lint (previously booked *social engagements* must be honored, see?) Leghorn21 Apr 2018 #56

+1 Lucinda Apr 2018 #58

No Definitive Ruling Yet On Attorney-Client Privilege struggle4progress Apr 2018 #36

Quite different than the OP headlines. Thanks. Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #41

Here are two articles that SEEM to contradict that. Interesting how different the takes are. pnwmom Apr 2018 #37

It is so strange oberliner Apr 2018 #43

Not true malaise Apr 2018 #42

It is true oberliner Apr 2018 #45

Don't see it at The Hill: Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #60

Curious, innit? OilemFirchen Apr 2018 #62

Trump supporters not liking that headline. Kingofalldems Apr 2018 #48

There are no Trump supporters at DU oberliner Apr 2018 #57

The FBI isn't going to deliver them to his office and leave them there. They'll be reviewed... George II Apr 2018 #64

Yes - thanks for that oberliner Apr 2018 #66