General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are Women Devouring Fifty Shades of Grey? [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Also, in case you haven't noticed, there are broad popular movements in Feminism (sex positive 3rd wavers, for instance) that reject the anti-porn censorship agenda of the likes of Dworkin, MacKinnon, Brownmiller, Dines, etc.
But, okay. Rape statistics are trending downward, you realize that, right?
I mean, one is too many. We can all agree on that.
Yes, in TMG, we do discuss it. Rape is not acceptable, nor are rape jokes. What are my "suggestions"? Well, one "suggestion" would be for certain people, like prominent self-proclaimed 2nd Wave Bloggers, to stop using what are at best charitably described as "extremely nuanced definitions of consent". No means no, each and every time. But that also implies that consenting adults who DO consent need the freedom and agency to make their own damn decisions. Which brings me to....
how did this come to be about "rape", exactly? Is 50 Shades of Grey about "rape"? I haven't read it, but I don't think it is. I think it's about consenting adult behavior. As is all the material Gail Dines rails against. What consenting adult sex has to do with "rape", exactly... Ever wonder why you're being told to mix up those things?
And see, if the anti-porn people were right and, say, pictures of consenting adults fucking had jack diddly to do with causing or otherwise facilitating rape, the statistics would be going up (what with the "pornification" and all) instead of down.
Right?