Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Gothmog
(179,623 posts)63. The Joy Reid Saga: The Wayback Machine cannot guarantee authenticity
The wayback machine does not guarantee anything https://burningbird.net/the-joy-reid-saga-the-wayback-machine-cannot-guarantee-authenticity/#.WuDw69w6PTy.twitter
The same cannot be said for the actual Wayback Machine archives.
The Wayback Machine is an invaluable historical record of the web. Through it, Ive been able to recover past writings lost because of all the many changes Ive made to my web site. Its a wonderful way of exploring the webs history.
However, the Wayback Machine is not, and never has been, a definitive source of the authenticity of what it captures on the web. It has access to a web page at a specific location at a specific time but no special privilege that allows it to determine the authenticity of the author of the content in the page.
As noted by Chris Butler at the Internet Archives, home organization for the Wayback Machine:
Pages archived at different dates and by different entities... This statement is key to understanding the difference between Wayback Machines archival functionality as separate from the medias assumption of Wayback Machine as Super Authenticator, able to leap tall metadata with a single bound!
The Wayback Machine is an invaluable historical record of the web. Through it, Ive been able to recover past writings lost because of all the many changes Ive made to my web site. Its a wonderful way of exploring the webs history.
However, the Wayback Machine is not, and never has been, a definitive source of the authenticity of what it captures on the web. It has access to a web page at a specific location at a specific time but no special privilege that allows it to determine the authenticity of the author of the content in the page.
As noted by Chris Butler at the Internet Archives, home organization for the Wayback Machine:
When we reviewed the archives, we found nothing to indicate tampering or hacking of the Wayback Machine versions. At least some of the examples of allegedly fraudulent posts provided to us had been archived at different dates and by different entities.
Pages archived at different dates and by different entities... This statement is key to understanding the difference between Wayback Machines archival functionality as separate from the medias assumption of Wayback Machine as Super Authenticator, able to leap tall metadata with a single bound!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have a question for Joan. What about the tweets and blog posts She admits were homophobic...
Hassin Bin Sober
Apr 2018
#65
Naw, you posted some shit without comment about her lawyer supporting a neo naiz grouip
uponit7771
Apr 2018
#34
Unlike pretty much everyone else, I believe in second changes and change.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2018
#10
I don't have a problem with that... everyone makes mistakes and people do change...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2018
#21
After these same people touted creatively edited emails to sink a Dem, you trust them? Yeah, nope.
bettyellen
Apr 2018
#8
Or you'll be called a hypocrite yourself? You're not going to make the case Reid is a homophobe
uponit7771
Apr 2018
#29
It is quite likely she was hacked and with wiki and Greenwald involved...I am susupicious. I love
Demsrule86
Apr 2018
#57
Are you suggesting that folks supporting her are not being intellectually honest?
Adrahil
Apr 2018
#15
She doesn't love Bernie and she believes the Russians lost us the general and not that Hillary was
Demsrule86
Apr 2018
#58
What does that have to do with whether Joy was hacked or not? That's the only issue for me...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2018
#24
Yes... I would indeed!! What I tried to say, inartfully, is I wouldn't have a problem with HER...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2018
#61
I don't even care about the homophobia. But if she's lying about the "hacking"
Azathoth
Apr 2018
#37
I think it is entirely possible it was hacked...and the fact that Wiki and Sanders supporters who
Demsrule86
Apr 2018
#54
Premise rejected. I knew something like this would happen when she took on Mrs. Bernie
ecstatic
Apr 2018
#60