Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CentralMass

(16,910 posts)
7. Let the facts on the alleged tampering be aired. This article seems
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 06:42 PM
Apr 2018

to make a strong case that tampering was not done.
I am not passing judgment until the dust clears.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Supporters of a certain non-Dem also ran are salty about Joy. LexVegas Apr 2018 #1
Yes, that is interesting isn't it? JNelson6563 Apr 2018 #3
Perhaps more interesting than disparaging anti-gay comments. David__77 Apr 2018 #5
Gay men might not like being called sexual predators. David__77 Apr 2018 #4
Definitely this. NurseJackie Apr 2018 #46
I trust Joan Walsh here Gothmog Apr 2018 #2
Except that it is with her - actually. TheSmarterDog Apr 2018 #6
Let the facts on the alleged tampering be aired. This article seems CentralMass Apr 2018 #7
The Joy Reid Saga: The Wayback Machine cannot guarantee authenticity Gothmog Apr 2018 #8
If she didn't say those things, I hope evidence to that effect comes out as soon as possible. David__77 Apr 2018 #10
Isn't part of the evidence the very odd fact that the homophobic statements pnwmom Apr 2018 #48
That could very well be. David__77 Apr 2018 #50
See the Joan Walsh twitter thread re comments, posted in post 2. emulatorloo Apr 2018 #52
Where do you see no one responded? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #53
Joan Walsh says they didn't. I believe her. pnwmom Apr 2018 #58
I figured as much. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #59
Why are you so eager to believe she was posting homophobic comments over and over pnwmom Apr 2018 #61
She speaks out about a certain failed non-Dem. nt LexVegas Apr 2018 #63
Regardless of where she may have been yesterday, where is she today? marble falls Apr 2018 #9
This is total bullshit. trof Apr 2018 #11
Some claims about gay men may be total bullshit. David__77 Apr 2018 #13
The writer of the article, by his own admission, has not seen the evidence. lapucelle Apr 2018 #12
20 years ago I said as much, I regret the words but have you not said things that were ignorant? Demonaut Apr 2018 #14
This would be a false equivalency PDittie Apr 2018 #71
This isn't about anything other than silencing the voice of a powerful black woman. NightWatcher Apr 2018 #15
It's not about the statements made about gay men and homosexuality? David__77 Apr 2018 #16
Post removed Post removed Apr 2018 #17
Yeah we gay guys (including Glenn Greenwald) better STFU right?nt m-lekktor Apr 2018 #19
You just want a pony!!! QC Apr 2018 #38
If you don't they will send it to a jury. bahrbearian Apr 2018 #41
I don't care where she was so many peabody Apr 2018 #18
If she didn't make those comments, great! David__77 Apr 2018 #21
What story? And why would it matter now? peabody Apr 2018 #26
No it isn't. nt m-lekktor Apr 2018 #20
I'm sorry, I'm missing the point of your OP. Not being negative, just not sure where you're going. George II Apr 2018 #22
It is an article in a publication. David__77 Apr 2018 #23
Then I guess you agree with the article then? George II Apr 2018 #25
I do wonder who made the comments David__77 Apr 2018 #27
Where are her negative posts followed by responses calling her out? pnwmom Apr 2018 #24
From what I've read about this all day, not one comment calling her out pre-2006. That alone... George II Apr 2018 #28
Quite suspicious, George mcar Apr 2018 #33
"In December I learned that an unknown, external party accessed and manipulated material.." melman Apr 2018 #29
There were two completely different incidents. The one in December and now this one. George II Apr 2018 #31
No kidding melman Apr 2018 #40
No, apparently two different blogs but not sure. George II Apr 2018 #42
Given that she admitted the Crist posts were hers mythology Apr 2018 #55
Yes melman Apr 2018 #57
I generally believe where there's smoke, there's fire MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #30
The Joy bashers are being trolled. TomSlick Apr 2018 #32
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2018 #35
NOBODY has read the supposed posts in real time, nor was there pushback in real time..... George II Apr 2018 #43
*** THERE ARE NO COMMENTS ON THESE POST IN QUESTION!!! *** uponit7771 Apr 2018 #34
From what I understand, according to the researcher representing Ms. Reid blogslut Apr 2018 #36
Yes they would and the LoC, any of the scrapers would archive the altered entries uponit7771 Apr 2018 #68
I confess that in my youth I was intolerant or worse Cary Apr 2018 #37
I was a Bill Buckley supporter back in the early 1960s when he ran for Mayor of NYC. George II Apr 2018 #44
My Civil Rights professor was Jules Gerard Cary Apr 2018 #47
And so it goes........... George II Apr 2018 #56
So true of many of us... Docreed2003 Apr 2018 #60
I can remember when President Obama was being labeled a homophobe. Scurrilous Apr 2018 #39
Breitbart is reposting this article from The Atlantic... musette_sf Apr 2018 #45
You're right, the evidence is not with her janterry Apr 2018 #49
To clarify, that is the article's position - not mine. David__77 Apr 2018 #51
Well, then I agree with the the IT folks janterry Apr 2018 #54
I've seen the altered post and there's no doubt ghosting around the text and the fact uponit7771 Apr 2018 #70
I know you hate her, but the issue has been investigated by MSNBC, and she was telling the truth ecstatic Apr 2018 #62
Well, Im not fond of the comments. David__77 Apr 2018 #64
When did MSNBC say that? melman Apr 2018 #65
Today. Here: ecstatic Apr 2018 #66
So, nowhere did MSNBC actually say melman Apr 2018 #67
They don't have to, all these people missing all of thoseg comments his highly improbable uponit7771 Apr 2018 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Evidence Is Not With ...»Reply #7