Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary for NYS AG [View all]NightWatcher
(39,389 posts)12. Because that wouldn't look wrong and give anyone a reason to say "witch hunt".
How about they just put someone in AG who doesn't have anything that looks like abuse or anything else in their background that could be used as leverage?
Is that too much to ask?
No teen sexters, chicken fuckers, whore mongers, dog fighters, squirrel molesters...
The Dems have to be squeaky clean while the repukes will vote for and promote all of the above.
Fuck.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"The AG has to have a current law license," - not a requirement per the New York State Constitution.
PoliticAverse
May 2018
#18
Because that wouldn't look wrong and give anyone a reason to say "witch hunt".
NightWatcher
May 2018
#12
Wow. That would be something. She's not got experience as a prosecutor though.
applegrove
May 2018
#13
If she isn't part of the case against cheetolini and Cohen, why not an AG Clinton?
marble falls
May 2018
#30
"Did Hillary ever practice law?" - young enough to not recognize the phrase "Rose law firm"? n/t
PoliticAverse
May 2018
#34