Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SHRED

(28,136 posts)

6. To me using the term "partisan" minimizes this

Reply to Pachamama (Reply #4)

Thu Sep 6, 2018, 11:26 AM

Sep 2018

To me it's a fight for transparency.
It's a fight to get to the truth about this nominee in the public sphere.
It's a fight against those who favor secrecy.

Much bigger than partisanism.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Partisan? [View all] SHRED Sep 2018 OP

did he say that about republicans and Merrick Garland? spanone Sep 2018 #1

which fight? the SCOTUS nominee, Trump V Woodward or the press or some other? rurallib Sep 2018 #2

This Kavanaugh hearing SHRED Sep 2018 #3

It is sad. It is partisan. Its David Gergen. Pachamama Sep 2018 #4

To me using the term "partisan" minimizes this SHRED Sep 2018 #6

Indeed it is Shred....which is why its important to focus on the fight and not worry about the term Pachamama Sep 2018 #7

In a sense he's right. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2018 #5

If we do it, it's partisan. If they do it, its patriotic. Nitram Sep 2018 #8

For Gergen the only time is isn't "partisan" COLGATE4 Sep 2018 #9