Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
32. Well, maybe not a landslide but Hillary did win
Sun Sep 9, 2018, 09:34 AM
Sep 2018

And since we know there has been widespread suppression of the vote, gerrymandering and misinformation going on as well as ballots being “lost”, and lets not forget electronic attacks by Russia, maybe Hillary did actually get a landslide.

We keep acting as if the vote is clean and transparent. It hasn’t been since at least the year George Bush was selected. But we just keep falling for the lies again and again.

We keep watching the same movie over and over hoping the ending will be different. If we don’t stop doing that nothing will change. Nothing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Added this to my twitter profile underthematrix Sep 2018 #1
I will look for Generic on my ballot Sherman A1 Sep 2018 #2
Res ipsa loquitur DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #3
I will vote in my local election and hope that it is a huge turnout nationwide, but Sherman A1 Sep 2018 #4
Trump won't want to quote this Rassmussen poll n/t Tom Rinaldo Sep 2018 #5
Scott Rasmussen sold the polling company that bears his name a few years ago. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #6
We are voting for IMPEACHMENT Generic Other Sep 2018 #7
If Rasmussen Says 10%-it's More like 15% Stallion Sep 2018 #8
"Generic Democrat" would have won the 2016 Presidential election in a landslide oberliner Sep 2018 #9
So you're saying Democrats can't win? Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #10
No. He is not saying that. Not at all. Please read for comprehension what he wrote again. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #12
Didn't ask you. Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #13
If you don't want public comments to public posts, don't post in public. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #14
I do think the poster has added an element of confusion. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #19
Looks like the post I responded to was false. Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #21
I don't know. Neither of you have submitted evidence. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #22
So apparently you accepted the post I responded to on face value. Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #23
No. But what you said about it does not follow logically from what the poster wrote. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #24
A generic House ballot is different than a generic presidential ballot. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #26
Separate but true. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #28
Sir, you would be incorrect. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #16
Great catch. Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #20
My impression of oberliner's post was replace Hillary with "Generic Democrat" in 2016 Awsi Dooger Sep 2018 #30
That's why I said it looked as if he was trying to obfuscate the issue. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #31
Well, maybe not a landslide but Hillary did win lunatica Sep 2018 #32
I'm looking forward to all those GENERIC wins. NurseJackie Sep 2018 #11
Res ipsa loquitur (REDUX) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #15
Let's make it 20 points! SkyDancer Sep 2018 #17
Let's make the Republican party so small you can flush it down the toilet. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #18
That would be a fantastic goal NewJeffCT Sep 2018 #25
And for good measure GWC58 Sep 2018 #27
If Raz is 11 pts, the real number is 15 to 20% KelleyKramer Sep 2018 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***GENERIC BALLOT: DEMOCR...»Reply #32