General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lots of misunderstanding around here about what Michael Moore is doing. [View all]JHan
(10,173 posts)The question remains: How do you think it changed the game? Again, how was it shocking that a question would be asked about the water crisis in flint? I knew a question would be asked about the water crisis in flint. My point is these were questions Clinton didn't need, and clearly didn't benefit from ( As your Huffington Post link points out, why was her answer so unsatisfactory if she had all the time to prepare for the question anyway)
Sketchy unethical behavior by Donna Brazille over obvious questions doesn't equal a primary being rigged. Even if Sanders were competitive during the primaries, it would still be lame evidence of "internal" rigging at the DNC.
The focus should not even be the primaries itself. If Moore actually cared, he would push for getting the debates out of the hands of the Corporate News Media Houses ( at least some of the debates). And while it was ethically sketchy what Donna did, it's hardly new in politics.