Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
3. So you're saying the Times spent months researching and writing a meaningless 8-page story...
Wed Oct 3, 2018, 11:13 AM
Oct 2018

...just in case they needed to distract people from something else?

The only thing worse than a bad conspiracy theory is a lazy one.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Oct 2018 OP
Rachel Maddow snowybirdie Oct 2018 #1
Yeah. Cool story bro. awesomerwb1 Oct 2018 #2
So you're saying the Times spent months researching and writing a meaningless 8-page story... brooklynite Oct 2018 #3
Ok, Separation Oct 2018 #8
No Separation Oct 2018 #15
Have your read the NYT piece or are you just relying on The Hill? BTW, did you know... DonViejo Oct 2018 #4
This! dewsgirl Oct 2018 #7
Ok stop now Separation Oct 2018 #11
IOW you haven't read the NYT article and you are relying solely on The Hill's vision DonViejo Oct 2018 #13
My question is: thucythucy Oct 2018 #5
............... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2018 #6
MARK IT ZERO! peekaloo Oct 2018 #10
LOL! lunatica Oct 2018 #9
Nonsense. That story took 18 months of research The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #12
OK fine Separation Oct 2018 #14
The point... ADX Oct 2018 #21
What was bumped from the front page again Separation Oct 2018 #23
Speak for yourself. I do. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #25
Are you the average nonpolitical junkie? Separation Oct 2018 #26
They're not prosecutors... lame54 Oct 2018 #22
The story was about tax fraud, not money laundering. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #24
Unrec. n/t demmiblue Oct 2018 #16
+1... SidDithers Oct 2018 #19
So what? n/t leftstreet Oct 2018 #17
Tried to clear OP up Separation Oct 2018 #18
I don't need any more proof. Loge23 Oct 2018 #20
you seem very concerned ! stonecutter357 Oct 2018 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #3