General Discussion

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

53. You need to join Mueller's team.

Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:31 AM

Nov 2018

Since you know through NYT articles how easy it is to get Presidential testimony. Mueller has been negotiating for about a year now with Trump and his team for testimony. If they had you on the team you could have just shown them the articles and it would have been over a year ago. Please forward the links to Mueller. TIA. His contact is special.counsel@usdoj.gov

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could RUMPS secret service block [View all] bluestarone Nov 2018 OP

It was an issue with Watergate, but they ended up serving them to subjects' lawyers. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #1

TY bluestarone Nov 2018 #2

A more interesting question..... getagrip_already Nov 2018 #3

The crowds in the streets outside the White House will make him change his mind about that TeamPooka Nov 2018 #7

doubt it.... getagrip_already Nov 2018 #9

all while televised live on TV? get real, not paranoid like the GOP TeamPooka Nov 2018 #10

remember those proud fools who were caught with sniper rifles on a roof in washington? getagrip_already Nov 2018 #12

I think you give them too much credit. They know they're outnumbered. Crutchez_CuiBono Nov 2018 #27

Can't SS members who prevent Trump's arrest Progressive Jones Nov 2018 #22

You can't serve someone's lawyer without their consent Jersey Devil Nov 2018 #4

If the lawyer has represented the client in related cases or issues related to this case. NightWatcher Nov 2018 #6

There is no "case" pre-indictment Jersey Devil Nov 2018 #8

Again, the judge allowed the DNC to do so with Jared Trump's attorneys...per Jill Wine-Banks hlthe2b Nov 2018 #15

You could give notice in his favorite newspaper then maybe? Crutchez_CuiBono Nov 2018 #31

You have to serve someone personally in most cases Jersey Devil Nov 2018 #36

Good to know. Crutchez_CuiBono Nov 2018 #37

DOJ could serve his personal attorney. That counts in matters like this. NightWatcher Nov 2018 #5

That is what I said in post #1... DNC did so as well with Jared hlthe2b Nov 2018 #16

in all seriousness... getagrip_already Nov 2018 #11

Remember, Dirty Donny* has his own private Goon Squad (R) Achilleaze Nov 2018 #14

It is a non issue. former9thward Nov 2018 #13

Not true: 1974 US V Nixon: after Nixon was subpoenaed for the Watergate tapes hlthe2b Nov 2018 #18

It is true. Please read the decision. former9thward Nov 2018 #20

It is true that the subpoeana was delivered to the President for HIS tapes, thus US v NIXON hlthe2b Nov 2018 #21

The issue is a person's testimony. former9thward Nov 2018 #24

Subpoenas can be for materials, documents, OR for testimony. They are still Presidential subpoenas hlthe2b Nov 2018 #25

Jefferson did not testify in the trial. former9thward Nov 2018 #29

Honestly. you apparently refuse to read the article. hE WAS SUBPOENAED AS WAS NIXON. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #32

He was subpoenaed and refused. former9thward Nov 2018 #39

Contrary to your false assertion, there have been two Presidents served subpoenas in history: hlthe2b Nov 2018 #41

You are incorrect on several points. First, Thomas Jefferson was subpoenaed in the Burr trial. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #23

The Nixon case was for hard evidence not testimony. former9thward Nov 2018 #26

It was still a Presidential subpoena in both cases. Perhaps you should read the article cited and hlthe2b Nov 2018 #28

Jefferson DID comply in Washington for oral testimony, not in Richmond as originally requested hlthe2b Nov 2018 #30

No he did not. former9thward Nov 2018 #33

He OFFERED to which meant that he accepted the legal responsibility to do so and validity hlthe2b Nov 2018 #34

Nixon was not subpoenaed for testimony. former9thward Nov 2018 #40

Contrary to your false assertion, there have been two Presidents served subpoenas in history: hlthe2b Nov 2018 #42

YOUR assertion was that "No president (or his legal representatives) have ever been served with hlthe2b Nov 2018 #46

Your original false assertion: "No president (or his legal representatives) have ever been served w hlthe2b Nov 2018 #43

Your original false assertion: "No president (or his legal representatives) have ever been served w hlthe2b Nov 2018 #45

you claim: "No president (or his legal representatives) have ever been served with a subpoena" FALSE hlthe2b Nov 2018 #47

You are deliberately trying to be obtuse. former9thward Nov 2018 #48

NO, you are intentionally trying to state what you did not pose. It is disingenuous as hell hlthe2b Nov 2018 #49

You said Jefferson testified. former9thward Nov 2018 #50

You claim: "No president (or his legal representatives) have ever been served with a subpoena" FALSE hlthe2b Nov 2018 #51

You need to join Mueller's team. former9thward Nov 2018 #53

I should. I would love that. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #54

I say let Acosta serve him at a presser. n/t Whiskeytide Nov 2018 #17

Now THIS i like bluestarone Nov 2018 #19

BOOM!! Crutchez_CuiBono Nov 2018 #35

No - it would be delivered to the WH Counsel. brooklynite Nov 2018 #38

Ultimately, it is not his Secret Service. scarletlib Nov 2018 #44

I want to see his tax returns... :) SimpleC Nov 2018 #52