Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CabCurious

(954 posts)
18. 1. Zakaria apologized for what, then? 2. The two passages show blatant plagiarism
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:32 PM
Aug 2012

As Adam Winkler, a constitutional-law scholar at U.C.L.A., demonstrates in a remarkably nuanced new book, "Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America," firearms have been regulated in the United States from the start. Laws banning the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in Kentucky and Louisiana in 1813, and other states soon followed: Indiana (1820), Tennessee and Virginia (1838), Alabama (1839), and Ohio (1859). Similar laws were passed in Texas, Florida, and Oklahoma. As the governor of Texas explained in 1893, the "mission of the concealed deadly weapon is murder. To check it is the duty of every self-respecting, law-abiding man."


The blatant plagiarism:

Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the actual history in Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Guns were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the Republic. Laws that banned the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in Kentucky and Louisiana in 1813. Other states soon followed: Indiana in 1820, Tennessee and Virginia in 1838, Alabama in 1839 and Ohio in 1859. Similar laws were passed in Texas, Florida and Oklahoma. As the governor of Texas (Texas!) explained in 1893, the "mission of the concealed deadly weapon is murder. To check it is the duty of every self-respecting, law-abiding man."


I respect that this wasn't an academic piece, but somebody spent time and effort rewriting that to be slightly different.

My guess is that Zakaria has a lot of others working for him with the increasing number of publications and projects. This could have been a ghost writer or an intern, which may explain the quick "clearance of wrongdoing" by those with a commercial interest in his brand name.

I personally respect the man, but I respect his apology... not this cover-up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never listened to a more even handed, insightful, unprejudiced, and intelligent person on the tv. nt 2on2u Aug 2012 #1
and an admitted plagiarist. some people get fired for it. i guess the 'elect' don't, same as HiPointDem Aug 2012 #3
If he'd only keep it to a four paragraph maximum.... and put a little link thingy.... seems to 2on2u Aug 2012 #4
you're comparing journalists to chatroom participants? really? HiPointDem Aug 2012 #10
I'm comparing copyrighted material to copyrighted material. You? n't 2on2u Aug 2012 #11
zakaria didn't quote with attribution. he minimally paraphased large chunks of someone else's HiPointDem Aug 2012 #12
Yes, I understand that..... like I said if only he used to four paragraph max with attributes. n't 2on2u Aug 2012 #13
what I saw was mostly just stating stats, years, facts. Whisp Aug 2012 #15
baloney. HiPointDem Aug 2012 #16
Yeah, if he hadn't rewritten it to try to hide it, and if he had put in a link, he'd have been OK muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #14
Good. Glad to hear it. eom Maeve Aug 2012 #2
he's still a plagiarist, whether he gets a pass or not. HiPointDem Aug 2012 #5
It could be isolated, but there's no way that is 'unintentional' muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #7
I agree. Lone_Star_Dem Aug 2012 #8
Yep, I agree too twins.fan Aug 2012 #17
Good. Now let's move on. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #6
Here's his statement. lightcameron Aug 2012 #9
1. Zakaria apologized for what, then? 2. The two passages show blatant plagiarism CabCurious Aug 2012 #18
doubly not his work, then. plagiarized & ghost-written (ghost-plagiarized). HiPointDem Aug 2012 #19
Exactly, but I feel this has lessened him and journalism CabCurious Aug 2012 #20
I'm glad to hear he was reinstated davidpdx Aug 2012 #21
Maybe now Zakaria can get on with pimping the next war (Iran), in his coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fareed Zakaria Cleared By...»Reply #18