Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(28,158 posts)

1. I don't have it in front of me, but the wording was along the lines of "55 or older by the end of...

Fri Aug 17, 2012, 12:34 PM

Aug 2012

2011" as to what age would not be effected.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question on the Ryan plan. [View all] RagAss Aug 2012 OP

Thanks Lone Star ! RagAss Aug 2012 #2

More than welcome. Lone_Star_Dem Aug 2012 #5

The implication that they are making is, IIRC.... Wounded Bear Aug 2012 #3

I think it was 55 years of age.. SoapBox Aug 2012 #4

I just missed it by a year according to the 2011 cutoff date. RagAss Aug 2012 #6

I made the cutoff, spouse did not Freddie Aug 2012 #7