Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
143. Nope. He wasn't too busy to show up to vote AGAINST Russia sanctions 3 times.
Wed Jan 16, 2019, 08:17 PM
Jan 2019

So his position is clear.

he is lazy. trueblue2007 Jan 2019 #1
He is lazy, but I think it's more than that NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #4
That and the tax returns to me adds up to real big problems, REAL big. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #6
I want to see the tax returns Gothmog Jan 2019 #67
Me too. Susan Calvin Jan 2019 #99
Amen. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #156
Why? TSheehan Jan 2019 #218
Why Not? Raine1967 Jan 2019 #220
Yep. Susan Calvin Jan 2019 #246
Because presidential candidates need to be transparent Gothmog Jan 2019 #249
Absolute Transparency. Cha Jan 2019 #389
Are you serious? yardwork Jan 2019 #406
i want to see the tax returns FOR ALL POLITICIANS. trueblue2007 Jan 2019 #374
Maryland has a ballot access law that will require these returns to get onto ballot Gothmog Jan 2019 #375
Yep. LakeArenal Jan 2019 #122
Good On You Me. Jan 2019 #181
Nope. TSheehan Jan 2019 #187
Nope? Raine1967 Jan 2019 #222
Word. nt Susan Calvin Jan 2019 #247
Bernie and Trump love Russia? Maybe they should move there. trueblue2007 Jan 2019 #76
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #190
This message was self-deleted by its author onit2day Jan 2019 #370
What's, uh, "puzzling" about it? MousePlayingDaffodil Jan 2019 #101
Yes, I'm seeing that the OP says that he voted against sanctions several times, Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #140
Oh ffs, this is pure character assassination. TSheehan Jan 2019 #186
No mention of his Russia trip in the OP. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #282
... betsuni Jan 2019 #283
Certainly not radical noodle Jan 2019 #294
In other news, this just in... Bernie's not a Democrat... InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #303
Yes indeed. He is quite vulnerable in that regard. People dislike that about him. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #345
Is it character assassination to point out facts NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #377
Oh ffs, senators have one job. They vote on bills. Sanders failed to vote. yardwork Jan 2019 #407
Bernie was busy True Blue American Jan 2019 #321
after once maybe 3 or 4 times though, that's an agenda. He sure made the presser this time too uponit7771 Jan 2019 #22
There is a theme to those votes. I begin to suspect it goes beyond laziness. Squinch Jan 2019 #43
There's a pattern. yardwork Jan 2019 #72
Me too. cwydro Jan 2019 #104
We don't need another lazy President. bluescribbler Jan 2019 #117
Yeah, no shit. cwydro Jan 2019 #171
Fortunately Sanders is not lazy. TSheehan Jan 2019 #193
+1 ... inane stuff. KPN Jan 2019 #278
Could this be the problem True Blue American Jan 2019 #323
Take a LOOK AT POST 323...That is it..!!!!!!!!!!!!! MONEY !!!!!!!!!!! Stuart G Jan 2019 #361
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #185
Or could it be that he admires communistic dogma more than our constitutional government? olegramps Jan 2019 #335
His vote would have made no difference whatsoever. So why attack him? onit2day Jan 2019 #371
It's time to start taking notice. W_HAMILTON Jan 2019 #2
Say it louder for the folks in the back. nycbos Jan 2019 #3
I'm finally listening. Keep it up more will finally go: Oh.... populistdriven Jan 2019 #98
Bernie 2020? Nyet! Beakybird Jan 2019 #5
Ouch. That graphic. Just ouch. NT WeekiWater Jan 2019 #7
Russians are using him as propaganda as his no show helps them. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #8
Tad Devine 33taw Jan 2019 #9
I think we have a winner! MaryMagdaline Jan 2019 #24
Winner, winner, chicken dinner. MrsCoffee Jan 2019 #176
+1 Maven Jan 2019 #346
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #16
Except he's not a Democrat. This looks VERY bad, and Dems are right to be chimpymustgo Jan 2019 #21
What is up with Bernie and Russia? Again? TomCADem Jan 2019 #11
Good questions. Cha Jan 2019 #13
Not a good look, is it. sheshe2 Jan 2019 #253
Not good at all.. Shine the Light! Cha Jan 2019 #258
Bernie spent his True Blue American Jan 2019 #113
VERY good question hueymahl Jan 2019 #162
Thats a damn good question. paleotn Jan 2019 #168
It IS a damn good question. And yes. He does need to explain himself. Fully. calimary Jan 2019 #353
Because he doesn't want war? TSheehan Jan 2019 #203
And, all the Dems who voted to Block trump's move Cha Jan 2019 #233
Then He Should Own It So That People Can Make That Choice... TomCADem Jan 2019 #262
That's very interesting davekriss Jan 2019 #269
This is a Russian talking point. Interesting Maven Jan 2019 #347
Great questions! R B Garr Jan 2019 #219
He was "busy" NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #378
Mueller probably has the answer. n/t Apollyonus Jan 2019 #384
Too busy? Cha Jan 2019 #12
Very busy dalton99a Jan 2019 #205
So busy.. Cha Jan 2019 #217
+1. His Russia stance deserves scrutiny dalton99a Jan 2019 #234
Yes, it does.. he was too busy again, and "missed the symbolic rebuke.." Cha Jan 2019 #237
He's a bit busy putting his campaign team together. comradebillyboy Jan 2019 #14
I thought True Blue American Jan 2019 #328
It's always good to ask why zipplewrath Jan 2019 #15
And yet oddly enough EVERY time...sigh Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #18
Quoting the source zipplewrath Jan 2019 #25
Maybe edit in a link to your source so there isn't any confusion that those are your words emulatorloo Jan 2019 #56
"personal attack of me and most democrats." What about Sanders and all the Democrats who support him TSheehan Jan 2019 #189
The fact remains, he voted against the Magnitsky Act and the Russia Sanctions.... George II Jan 2019 #23
That time zipplewrath Jan 2019 #28
"Liberal conspiracy theorists," zipplewrath? What might those be? Also, who wrote this & linky? Hekate Jan 2019 #142
Yeah zipplewrath Jan 2019 #341
Thanks for seeing what I meant, anyway. Hekate Jan 2019 #365
+1000000 TSheehan Jan 2019 #188
Thank you for providing some context. nt hay rick Jan 2019 #266
Thank you! There's the Back Story... Duppers Jan 2019 #272
K&R betsuni Jan 2019 #17
https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/397879-rand-paul-blocks-sanders-russia-resolution-call wroberts189 Jan 2019 #19
Then WHY did he vote to combine the sanctions in committee? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #20
The real facts are he was on the negative side of two votes, 97-2 and 92-4. He's the only Senator.. George II Jan 2019 #29
I dont get it. Why do people ignore this and the tax return thing, I sincerely dont get it. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #32
Cult. backabby-blue Jan 2019 #38
Exactly . . . MousePlayingDaffodil Jan 2019 #133
Same reason True Blue American Jan 2019 #329
Lots of things bring up reoccuring questions. fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #373
That was June 2017 RandySF Jan 2019 #34
Yeah, Yeah Yeah ...He Always Has A Reason Me. Jan 2019 #182
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2019 #26
Yea sure... Bernie is pro russia...... and the moon is made of cheese. wroberts189 Jan 2019 #27
He is not Anti-Russia. That's for sure. PubliusEnigma Jan 2019 #33
Most Americans aren't anti Russian elmac Jan 2019 #123
Well said emulatorloo Jan 2019 #174
As an American I have much more freedom than a Russian citizen delisen Jan 2019 #214
well, tRump isn't close, he is a dictator, some people here just don't understand that. nt elmac Jan 2019 #348
The sanctions against Putin-pal Oleg Deripaska were because of Russian meddling in the election. pnwmom Jan 2019 #318
Why be anti-Russia? It's a beautiful country, rich in culture and history. TSheehan Jan 2019 #196
That's not what the poster meant by "anti-Russia". John Fante Jan 2019 #206
Dangerous to be a journalist there though. Tipperary Jan 2019 #207
There are tons of countries like that, some of which have been close allies of the US. TSheehan Jan 2019 #208
You certainly seem fond of Russia. Tipperary Jan 2019 #215
Relevance? TSheehan Jan 2019 #216
Many people are confused about what is relevant versus what is irrelevant. lapucelle Jan 2019 #224
It isn't rocket science. Putin attacked the US elections and Deripaska was a key player. emulatorloo Jan 2019 #265
Oh, I think Russia is plenty relevant. Tipperary Jan 2019 #228
Lol. Tipperary Jan 2019 #230
... lapucelle Jan 2019 #238
This. nt cwydro Jan 2019 #240
Ah there's The whataboutism. BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #275
Life expectancy of Russian males:66 years delisen Jan 2019 #223
... lapucelle Jan 2019 #241
This was a vote to maintain sanctions against Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch pnwmom Jan 2019 #317
Is he not? KPN Jan 2019 #322
He skipped a very close vote to maintain sanctions against Deripaska, pnwmom Jan 2019 #324
He explained the Magnitsky Act at the KPN Jan 2019 #330
Why didn't he make THIS vote then? He spent an hour at a staff meeting, pnwmom Jan 2019 #332
I already said my piece. KPN Jan 2019 #333
New here I see. GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #397
At this point we can still like him, just not support him populistdriven Jan 2019 #268
He SHOULD be anti-Deripaska. And yet he didn't bother to vote to maintain the sanctions. pnwmom Jan 2019 #316
What was so important that he had to miss? RandySF Jan 2019 #30
What is wrong with him? There is no excuse for this. PubliusEnigma Jan 2019 #31
The Russians have landed.Look at all the divisive comments over such trivia onit2day Jan 2019 #372
Not a big deal. He is a busy guy. Joe941 Jan 2019 #35
It's only voting against our enemy, is all. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #36
Would his vote have made or break the legislation? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #37
speechless Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #39
Is that now an acceptable excuse for missing a vote when a Senator is minutes away? ehrnst Jan 2019 #44
Rationalizing an excuse is clever as pie. LanternWaste Jan 2019 #49
What are you on about? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #54
Right on the money again HBS!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #88
Good one. pangaia Jan 2019 #96
So your defense is grantcart Jan 2019 #125
Proof HBS' point right here. N/t TCJ70 Jan 2019 #128
You didn't read the OP, did you? He voted AGAINST sanctions three times. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #146
Sorry, but voting records have consequences... paleotn Jan 2019 #173
it sounds like... druidity33 Jan 2019 #197
I wonder that, too. Donations? Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #356
That meeting didn't start until after the vote dansolo Jan 2019 #336
It was defeated by 2 votes. backabby-blue Jan 2019 #87
It was three. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #91
It doesn't take long to vote. backabby-blue Jan 2019 #95
He voted for the updated Magnitsky act after it was expanded to include ... Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #100
So Bernie helped defeat it sweetloukillbot Jan 2019 #390
Jfc Fuzzpope Jan 2019 #97
+1 fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #290
Trump is president now Mr.Bill Jan 2019 #115
Silly. Senate and House votes are not like general elections or primary votes. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #267
With that logic, I guess the 57 who voted Yea just wasted their time? George II Jan 2019 #358
No one knew that in advance of the vote, including him. It could have been 59-40, it was that close. George II Jan 2019 #364
He can't be bothered with such trivial matters, when somewhere there's a camera to stand in front of Clash City Rocker Jan 2019 #129
Exactly. Not so Cha Jan 2019 #410
Still trying to clean up a past campaign. WeekiWater Jan 2019 #134
Nope. He wasn't too busy to show up to vote AGAINST Russia sanctions 3 times. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #143
"Sen. Bernie Sanders misses the vote; his spokesman says he was meeting with women who accused his.. Cha Jan 2019 #144
I'm a bit of a simple dude. I see not voting being the same as voting against. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #291
Exactly what I was thinking, flea.. Cha Jan 2019 #292
I must be simple too True Blue American Jan 2019 #331
The meetings were on Capitol Hill. He could have ducked out to vote. SunSeeker Jan 2019 #295
Exactly right, SunSeeker.. There is No excuse. Zero. Cha Jan 2019 #296
+1000 Pachamama Jan 2019 #308
He voted AGAINST sanctions three times. It's in the OP. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #357
Every Vote Counts. It was a "symbolic rebuke" Cha Jan 2019 #388
As someone who has a lot of respect for Bernie hueymahl Jan 2019 #165
A very big deal. The vote was very close and Bernie's vote, if he had sided with the Democrats, pnwmom Jan 2019 #319
We have a big decision to make StarryNite Jan 2019 #40
Yep. The FIRST requirement I have and all of us should have is tax returns. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #41
Absolutely! StarryNite Jan 2019 #42
Yes, said it before and will say it again, NO ONE can run on the Democratic ticket Fla Dem Jan 2019 #64
Maybe "let's hear it" before we jump all over our own.... Chakaconcarne Jan 2019 #48
This isn't Independent Underground blugbox Jan 2019 #79
Good point! BigmanPigman Jan 2019 #94
Hey, I've used that one before ProudLib72 Jan 2019 #169
I actually voted for him in the 2016 presidential primary StarryNite Jan 2019 #120
Yeah, they're very helpful because BS Cha Jan 2019 #157
Every opportunity to drag Bernie's name through the mud must be pounced upon. mac56 Jan 2019 #45
What? so is the information incorrect? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #47
Time to add those episodes up nini Jan 2019 #58
Boy, you got that right! FiveGoodMen Jan 2019 #66
Its the favorite pass time for some elmac Jan 2019 #124
Gettin' old. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #131
Is his public voting record wrong? You have a problem with his actual record, or just with people... Hekate Jan 2019 #151
by all means bring it....the criticisms are few, they're just blasted over and over along with JCanete Jan 2019 #300
How is a politician's voting record "shit to throw at the wall"? betsuni Jan 2019 #305
Did they forget? Cha Jan 2019 #310
its the hyperbole that is the absurdity here. nt JCanete Jan 2019 #311
Well, I think it's hyperbole to call discussing a Senator's voting record as: betsuni Jan 2019 #314
The vote was yesterday (Wednesday) What is the "over and over again"? George II Jan 2019 #359
BS did this to himself.. Cha Jan 2019 #309
Ironic how these Bernie Bashers are the real dividers LiberalLovinLug Jan 2019 #369
Well if a statement of a fact is "dragging a name," perhaps that is a problem with the person... NNadir Jan 2019 #376
Why? Who is afraid of the facts? Apollyonus Jan 2019 #382
Self delete since everything is being flagged. sarcasmo Jan 2019 #46
Same old ax....grind away, grind away. That shit gets old faster than elevator music. Grind away. Magoo48 Jan 2019 #50
I am confused, which facts are you questioning? Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #51
I don't question your facts Mr. Rosewater. Magoo48 Jan 2019 #315
Corporate America is NOT an enemy Apollyonus Jan 2019 #383
I would argue that corporate greed leads to environmental degradation and political corruption Magoo48 Jan 2019 #403
Corporations are the enemy of all humanity? betsuni Jan 2019 #404
Individuals work in Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Agri, Massive mining, The big banks, Industrial fishing Magoo48 Jan 2019 #405
You forget a major part of capitalism Apollyonus Jan 2019 #408
just whisper the name of anyone even associated with Bernie.... irresistable Jan 2019 #65
You mean Oleg Deripaska? emulatorloo Jan 2019 #89
I'm also not surprised that Bernie skipped the vote to go meet with victims of sexual harrassment... irresistable Jan 2019 #102
Yes it is good he met with them. emulatorloo Jan 2019 #103
If he voted instead the headlines would be: Bernie Sanders Refuses to meet with victims of vsrazdem Jan 2019 #172
He was at that meeting for less than an hour. DURHAM D Jan 2019 #301
Bernie knew the whip count. Your "probably" and what you "assume" are just thoughts in your head. irresistable Jan 2019 #391
At least I can think. nt DURHAM D Jan 2019 #393
LOL. nt Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #147
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jan 2019 #83
... orangecrush Jan 2019 #52
Talkin' bout MY generation nt reACTIONary Jan 2019 #221
... orangecrush Jan 2019 #239
Just wow! I expected him to fight to maintain THESE sanctions Hortensis Jan 2019 #53
And there you go. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #57
How about you? I never trusted his judgement and this Hortensis Jan 2019 #73
Oh I came to a STARTLING conclusion about him 2 years ago. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #75
Sorry, Eliot. My husband distracted me and I came back and Hortensis Jan 2019 #86
NO problem, I enjoyed the question as it gave me an opportunity to expand on my position. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #90
slightly OT: almost trashed 'yet another bernie' thread ... Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #109
You are welcome Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #110
Yes, thanks. This one is a real wowser. Hortensis Jan 2019 #127
I've been slammed and alerted repeatedly about my thoughts on him nini Jan 2019 #55
Really? On a DEMOCRATIC message board? Apollyonus Jan 2019 #385
K&R from a former Bernie supporter. MelissaB Jan 2019 #59
Thanks. I was so focused on healthcare for so long that I didnt want Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #60
Hear hear! BigmanPigman Jan 2019 #105
Same here StarryNite Jan 2019 #276
This Concerns Me Roy Rolling Jan 2019 #61
Oh yeah, the RESPONSE by me and others is the problem...got it. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #62
Just too many questions about him. Lucca2 Jan 2019 #63
Some posts on this thread elmac Jan 2019 #126
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jan 2019 #166
The ones who said look the other way, there is nothing to this Russia thing? MrsCoffee Jan 2019 #179
Sanders Has Shown Us Who He is--We Should Believe Him dlk Jan 2019 #68
Thank YOU Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #69
A Jewish Democratic Socialist from Vermont? Yes, he is. Do you have a problem? TSheehan Jan 2019 #202
Not much I can really say about this... Blue_Tires Jan 2019 #70
It's very odd that some people are obsessed with tearing down Sanders. Who's paying them? TSheehan Jan 2019 #191
This is dodging the issue. John Fante Jan 2019 #211
So, you are calling anyone who doesn't support Sanders revmclaren Jan 2019 #227
Having fun? Oops, I mean did you have fun? betsuni Jan 2019 #231
Yup... revmclaren Jan 2019 #236
That one was trying way too hard. emulatorloo Jan 2019 #260
+1... SidDithers Jan 2019 #259
I voted for Sanders in the primary, so Blue_Tires Jan 2019 #340
Apparently, he was at that meeting only for an hour Apollyonus Jan 2019 #380
What's his excuse for missing this crucial vote? yardwork Jan 2019 #71
He's previously voted against Russian sanctions. This is part of a pattern. pnwmom Jan 2019 #77
Must not be serious about running again. honest.abe Jan 2019 #74
I can clearly draw a conclusion from this. n/t Apollyonus Jan 2019 #78
The optics are horrible for Bernie. MontanaMama Jan 2019 #80
To busy running for President to serve as Senator. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #81
He voted against the Magnitsky Act, and more recent sanctions bills. pnwmom Jan 2019 #85
@SenGillibrand changed her campaign kickoff schedule to return to DC for a cloture vote Gothmog Jan 2019 #82
Yeah, it was important. Again there are ONLY TWO reasons NOT to vote. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #84
Not a good move mcar Jan 2019 #92
Not good. Fuzzpope Jan 2019 #93
And we lost by just one vote...... Red Mountain Jan 2019 #106
So that the new "Sander's Rule"? honest.abe Jan 2019 #118
He voted AGAINST sanction three times. It's in the OP. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #150
Is there an answer on record? Red Mountain Jan 2019 #178
Gee when you lay it out just like that...sure does look odd. nt UniteFightBack Jan 2019 #107
lol TSheehan Jan 2019 #204
Exhibit A as to why Bernie can't be trusted. RelativelyJones Jan 2019 #108
WTF Bernie? cp Jan 2019 #111
this is not and / or Kurt V. Jan 2019 #112
What? This is, especially when added to past actions, a very big deal. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #114
I encountered a real, live Bernie or Buster on Facebook last week. cab67 Jan 2019 #116
He is dead to me from this point forward. I will never support Bernie for anything. Liberal In Red State Jan 2019 #119
I wonder if anyone has asked Sen. Sanders about it? mysteryowl Jan 2019 #121
I noticed that many of the anti bernie posts on this thread elmac Jan 2019 #130
But are they true? allgood33 Jan 2019 #135
You sure about that? paleotn Jan 2019 #175
Like it or not, Senator Sanders voting record will be examined if he chooses to run in 2020 emulatorloo Jan 2019 #232
+1. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #355
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #286
I've noticed that Sanders supporters are fairly new posters MyNameGoesHere Jan 2019 #339
I wish Bernie would quit his national aspirations. Beakybird Jan 2019 #132
Bernie didn't have to show up to vote Progressive dog Jan 2019 #136
O M G. I'm floored by this. nt Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #137
I honestly wonder how he would have voted today if he had bothered to show up. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #138
As soon as I get home I'm burning all my Bernie stickers, hats, shirts, action figures & books mastermind Jan 2019 #139
Burning causes pollution Apollyonus Jan 2019 #386
No word from trump about the 4 dead US soldiers JAD Jan 2019 #141
OMG, now I know how to get my posts to the greatest section mastermind Jan 2019 #145
BS brings it on himself by missing the vote on Rusian Sanctions Cha Jan 2019 #154
And Yet, He Couldn't Meet With The Women When It Was Happening Me. Jan 2019 #184
Right! He was "too busy".. and now Cha Jan 2019 #213
Why? ismnotwasm Jan 2019 #148
Children, its 2019 mastermind Jan 2019 #149
He's possibly running again in 2020. Besides... Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #152
I do enjoy threads like this mastermind Jan 2019 #297
please ignore me too eShirl Jan 2019 #312
Your comments over the short time you've belonged, have been noticed. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #351
That cuts both ways! BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #368
And get off of my lawn! MrsCoffee Jan 2019 #180
Instead of being a leader, Sanders was a no-show. WeekiWater Jan 2019 #153
If he had shown up, he would have voted w/the Republicans, like before. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #158
I do get that. WeekiWater Jan 2019 #160
Hmmm. Not sure you get the point. It's not leadership that is lacking. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #161
One does not negate the other. WeekiWater Jan 2019 #167
True dat. (stealing a phrase from the younger generation) Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #354
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #195
Bernie is better than Hillary? Is that your view? Tipperary Jan 2019 #226
I wonder if the word "oligarchs" will disappear from his speeches like "millionaires" did. betsuni Jan 2019 #155
Yep, Now That He A Millionaire Me. Jan 2019 #183
Stop it. TSheehan Jan 2019 #192
... betsuni Jan 2019 #198
ok. TSheehan Jan 2019 #199
The missing vote was bad optics ZeroSomeBrains Jan 2019 #159
His assignment was to attack Hillary from the left. apcalc Jan 2019 #163
You are suspect. Your divisive conspiratorial rhetoric proves it imo TSheehan Jan 2019 #201
...hmmm... still waiting for tax returns, and a full accounting of campaign finances... apcalc Jan 2019 #334
+1, and the Tad Devine and Paul Manafort connection explains R B Garr Jan 2019 #392
Numbers don't lie.(nt) ehrnst Jan 2019 #164
Exactly how deep have the penetrated our political system? paleotn Jan 2019 #170
He appears to be conflicted. MineralMan Jan 2019 #177
Who cares. Sanders is a great political fighter. TSheehan Jan 2019 #194
So Many People Care. Cha Jan 2019 #235
I care. MontanaMama Jan 2019 #284
Oh no! They lost by Bernie's one vote????? Autumn Jan 2019 #200
lol, right? TSheehan Jan 2019 #209
If he had left wherever he was to vote he would have been criticized for leaving Autumn Jan 2019 #212
Pretty much this Devil Child Jan 2019 #273
We won't know for sure, will we? George II Jan 2019 #363
BS was too busy.. Cha Jan 2019 #225
The headline would have been Sanders blew off sexual misconduct victims to vote on Autumn Jan 2019 #242
No, I didn't, and "sexual harassment" is Not funny. Cha Jan 2019 #243
No one said "sexual harassment" was funny. Nice try. He missed the vote people are pissed, Autumn Jan 2019 #245
Keep laughing.. Cha Jan 2019 #252
I will keep laughing. Cause it's funny as fuck how people complain about everything Autumn Jan 2019 #254
Yeah, keep yucking it up. Cha Jan 2019 #289
Spending an hour at a daylong meeting comes really close to "blowing it off." betsuni Jan 2019 #248
You should call his office and ask them. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #251
Can't, I'm a little bit busy. betsuni Jan 2019 #256
.. Cha Jan 2019 #274
Who knows what mr "micromanager" had in mind.. Cha Jan 2019 #255
It's perfectly understandable if he isn't going to run. betsuni Jan 2019 #263
I was thinkig the same thing ish.. Cha Jan 2019 #277
And he was never, ever given the benefit of the doubt. betsuni Jan 2019 #306
Yes, I remember. Cha Jan 2019 #307
I was surprised that sanders only spent one hour in this meeting Gothmog Jan 2019 #261
Sanders Meets With Former Staff Members, Seeking to Quell Anxiety Over Sexism Cha Jan 2019 #281
BS spent most of the day looking for his tax returns. DURHAM D Jan 2019 #302
That's not the point. The fact is 99 Senators voted, one didn't. George II Jan 2019 #360
Color me NOT surprised. Tipperary Jan 2019 #210
I thought he was a democrat all this time. dubyadiprecession Jan 2019 #229
Time for Bernie to go away. dem4decades Jan 2019 #244
... Scurrilous Jan 2019 #250
This NY Times report said Gillibrand didn't show up Polybius Jan 2019 #257
That's yesterday's vote. Gillibrand was there for today's vote, Sanders was not. emulatorloo Jan 2019 #264
Thank you! Polybius Jan 2019 #270
... emulatorloo Jan 2019 #271
CNN and CNBC mention it.. Cha Jan 2019 #288
The vote the previous day was a procedural vote requiring a simple majority, it passed easily. George II Jan 2019 #362
To be fair, he only says he is a Democrat lately when he runs for president. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #279
so what? azureblue Jan 2019 #280
K & R for exposure. SunSeeker Jan 2019 #285
The meetings lasted for nearly a day. BS attended for less than an hour. Cha Jan 2019 #287
+1. So hard to pencil in a few minutes dalton99a Jan 2019 #298
Obviously didn't feel it necessary to cast Cha Jan 2019 #304
Well, it's not like we ask everyone to get to the polls and vote. fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #293
Yeah, it's not like we haven't seen Cha Jan 2019 #313
I like that one...and some republicans voted with democrats for russian sanctions....how stupid do JCanete Jan 2019 #299
I don't know? How stupid is it not to impose sanctions against the Putin-associates pnwmom Jan 2019 #320
What does this mean: "some Republicans voted with Democrats for Russian sanctions ... betsuni Jan 2019 #326
it means saying that Sanders voted with republicans against sanctions is specious. nt JCanete Jan 2019 #366
Yeah, how stupid does Bernie have to get? honest.abe Jan 2019 #338
Shame on me, I wanted Bernie's book for christmas 2 years ago Ezior Jan 2019 #325
Oh the drama. KPN Jan 2019 #327
Why is the voting record of a politician drama? betsuni Jan 2019 #337
He voted against sanctions?? Didn't show up for final vote? BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2019 #342
OMG, I thought the news about Russia supporting him was probably fake, now??? lark Jan 2019 #343
Hugely troubling (and CONSISTENT) behavior. Texin Jan 2019 #344
This message was self-deleted by its author dsharp88 Jan 2019 #349
Wrong one, he did NOT VOTE Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #350
My mistake. You're right. dsharp88 Jan 2019 #352
Typical Bernie. Nobody is surprised. BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #367
To be fair he might have gotten word that the Repugnants had already agreed not to support it cstanleytech Jan 2019 #379
To accept that then we would have to say voting records are meaningless. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #395
Not at all, his past voting record is still relevant when he votes but when he is not there cstanleytech Jan 2019 #396
So he only votes on the easy and safe way. fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #399
If you want to see it that way thats fine, personally I am willing to try and give him the benefit cstanleytech Jan 2019 #400
Well he is the one who parlayed 99-1 votes into being a $27 independent rogue. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2019 #401
I'm sure Mueller has a folder Apollyonus Jan 2019 #381
Boink. Scurrilous Jan 2019 #387
Russia is so pleased at the very generous gift given to them. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #394
Can't vote against lifting sanctions on a proven enemy of our Democratic System, GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #398
... revmclaren Jan 2019 #402
Wait. The Senate voted to stop sanctions so billionaire Russians can get paid, but not to stop the.. Cha Jan 2019 #409
Just reminder to those thinking of supporting this man honest.abe Jan 2019 #411
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders does NOT S...»Reply #143