Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(21,862 posts)
70. Trump wants his $5.7 billion no matter what...that isn't "negotiating."
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 07:23 PM
Jan 2019

It's like going into a restaurant.

You see something on the menu and ask your server "what's in this?"

They tell you what's in it, and there is ONE ingredient that you CAN'T stomach, or maybe you're allergic to it.

So you ask the server if the chef can make the dish without that one ingredient, and the server responds "NO."

So you have the choice of ordering the dish and either simply not liking it, or perhaps having an allergic or life-threatening reaction like a peanut allergy, OR...you just don't order the dish.

And every dish Trump has served up has the $5.7 billion in it, and Democrats have done due diligence on the cost-effectiveness and usefulness of this particular "solution," and they KNOW it was a fake campaign promise made by Trump to woo the MAGAts. and in order for Democrats to do the jobs they were elected to do, they MUST say NO to anything that is a WASTE OF TAXPAYERS' money, and resources that could be better used elsewhere. And they HAVE voted for large sums of money...just not to be allocated to a "wall" or "fence" or "barrier."

It's all in the way that this mess is being framed. Trump's not budging on the $5.7 billion, and in his speech yesterday, HE REFERRED TO IT AS A "DOWN PAYMENT!" The "wall" or "fence" does NOT "cost" $5.7 billion. So he offers to temporarily restore programs HE KILLED with "executive orders" in exchange for the $5.7 billion, and that is NOT "compromise."

AND, the Democrats are smart enough to know, and have already said, that if they sign off on the $5.7 billion, he'll shut down the government again (or do something worse) when the next "down payment" is due.

So, the Democrats told their waiter / waitress "no thanks."

Sounds like the smartest move to make, given the circumstances.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #1
Idiot. Will not be supporting her. n/t Downtown Hound Jan 2019 #2
More than that. I will be contributing to her primary challenger. Salviati Jan 2019 #4
Mahalo! Cha Jan 2019 #38
Same here, someone needs to let us know who that is when the time comes. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #41
............ Generic Brad Jan 2019 #3
+22,000,000,000,000 at140 Jan 2019 #10
that's right... handmade34 Jan 2019 #5
Trump wants his $5.7 billion no matter what...that isn't "negotiating." Miles Archer Jan 2019 #70
What side is Gabbard on? johnp3907 Jan 2019 #6
It's a fair question. Scruffy1 Jan 2019 #15
Her own rusty fender Jan 2019 #19
Kai Kahele dalton99a Jan 2019 #7
+1!! Cha Jan 2019 #24
For CD2? I loved his Dad. mahina Jan 2019 #30
Yes. dalton99a Jan 2019 #32
Great News, mahina! Cha Jan 2019 #40
Mahalo Hekate Jan 2019 #36
Tulsi, I think Bashar al-Assad may need your input. WE surely DON'T... hlthe2b Jan 2019 #8
And The Real Tulsi Appears Me. Jan 2019 #9
She's been here all along. Her record speaks for itself. I will not be supporting her. yardwork Jan 2019 #11
You're Quite Right Me. Jan 2019 #14
I'm gay and her "apology" is not accepted. It sounded like her lawyers and publicists wrote it. yardwork Jan 2019 #16
Let's Just Sat She's Not Presidential Material Me. Jan 2019 #22
But, TG says.. Cha Jan 2019 #50
What A Wahahee Me. Jan 2019 #51
uh huh. Cha Jan 2019 #56
My Favorite Thing About Her DarthDem Jan 2019 #12
Iknowrite? roscoeroscoe Jan 2019 #31
It didn't take long for her to show her true colors. herding cats Jan 2019 #13
The Russians don't pay for nothing. yardwork Jan 2019 #17
Gabbard started last week "attacking Sen Mazie Hirono".. Cha Jan 2019 #44
Mazie Hirono is a national treasure! FM123 Jan 2019 #57
Yet another reason she's never going to be the nominee bitterross Jan 2019 #18
She's not supposed to be the nominee BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #21
Sowing confusion is the purpose of chaos candidates. CottonBear Jan 2019 #34
Yes, that is correct. BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #35
Hey, great way to start your run for the nomination! Adrahil Jan 2019 #20
So the Democrats put up the SAME bill that Senate Republicans voted for, and they have a hardened OnDoutside Jan 2019 #23
shocking Cha Jan 2019 #25
Well, Tulsi is basically a Repub in all but name... Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #26
She's only a Democrat jrandom421 Jan 2019 #59
Yep! LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #65
with friends like these... who needs enemies? Takket Jan 2019 #27
Translation: "Everybody look at meeee" mahina Jan 2019 #28
Great Googly Moogly njhoneybadger Jan 2019 #29
She's a Jill Stein in wolfs clothing Pisces Jan 2019 #33
Well it seems she's learned to bash dems quite like BS. we can do it Jan 2019 #37
Tulsi's bothsiderism is completely unsurprising. JHan Jan 2019 #39
Gabbard is dead wrong on the issue peggysue2 Jan 2019 #42
Hey, Tulsi, kiss your ass goodbye. Goodheart Jan 2019 #43
To be fair, it wasn't her money she was going to waste. yardwork Jan 2019 #58
Incredibly dopey strategy, if the comments were geared toward her Pres. campaign. bullwinkle428 Jan 2019 #45
No, Tulsi, there's just one side that's preventing this fucking insanity from ending. Initech Jan 2019 #46
Wow, what a clueless response. nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #47
Not a both sides issues and why she is not qualified to even be in beachbum bob Jan 2019 #48
TG says.. she's "not thinking about politics now".. Cha Jan 2019 #49
no chance. Kurt V. Jan 2019 #52
did she get this message pre-approved by Duke and Carlson? Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #53
Found this video of her trying to get out in front of her voting record. Onyrleft Jan 2019 #54
Oh Tulsi. Leave our party and just run as the damn BJP candidate, OK? (nt) Recursion Jan 2019 #55
FFS, going after the GOP voters?? nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #60
Traitor Tulsi. nt Maven Jan 2019 #61
Thank you Gabbard for explaining why you don't deserve to be the Democratic nominee. I wonder how still_one Jan 2019 #62
One side is evil and wrong nini Jan 2019 #63
I got a post removed for telling the truth about her JI7 Jan 2019 #64
Time to update My Account Jury Blacklist and add those who seem prone to flag others posts. TheBlackAdder Jan 2019 #67
Appeal still_one Jan 2019 #72
If she is voting with the Democrats regarding the budget bill LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #66
It's not a matter of differences. Fuck working with Trump. Autumn Jan 2019 #68
piss off, lady spanone Jan 2019 #69
well Tulsi Dyedinthewoolliberal Jan 2019 #71
Trump likes to say "both sides" a lot, too. Tarc Jan 2019 #73
Kick Yosemito Jan 2019 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tulsi Gabbard today: "Bot...»Reply #70