General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"? [View all]bitterross
(4,066 posts)I would place money on the fact that every self-righteous poster on this thread has clothing made in a sweat shop. In a place where women are not trafficked for sex, but for other labor. We all know it. We've all seen the news of these places collapsing or burning down. All while the people in them burn or are buried because the doors are locked from the inside.
But we love to change what we wear as often as possible. One might say it's an addiction, a compulsion. And, it's cheap. You KNOW why it's cheap. You just ignore it.
Please feel free to compare the morality of that with the morality of employing a sex-worker or buying drugs. I look forward to the justification for ignoring the treatment of the garment-makers in Asia while at the same time being so concerned with Asian workers trafficked to this country. Which Asian woman counts more?