Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the Russians DID have ability to hack vote tallies (NYT) [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,453 posts)89. Link to a source, please.
I'm pretty sure that these were voter registration machiens, not voting machines. Every story that anyoe on DU has claimed demonstrated that voting machines were hacked ultimately turns out to be about voter registration machines. I assume this is the same.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
205 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the recount faced intense obstruction by the well funded rethugs - including legal costs for
diva77
May 2019
#199
+1000 This. Plus, sometimes it is virtually impossible to detect malicious code -- "easter eggs"
diva77
Apr 2019
#68
Maybe the four voting machine manufacturers should self-police, like the AMA, Pharma, ABA, etc.
erronis
Apr 2019
#70
Of course. I was just noting what the article said, not offering an opinion.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Apr 2019
#96
I'm just pointing out what the article said; I didn't *write* it, FFS!
The Velveteen Ocelot
Apr 2019
#130
Ron Baiman, Ph. D., says it was 26 out of 28 states. Here is his latest update of his paper.
triron
Apr 2019
#163
*IF* (not saying they could, saying IF) they could selectively un-register people?
mr_lebowski
Apr 2019
#16
Most jurisdictions have a way to verify the provisional ballot has been cleared
Ms. Toad
Apr 2019
#107
Yeah. It's not like removing people from the voter roles has any effect or anything
kcr
Apr 2019
#29
Of course. That is why Manafort gave WI, PA & MI polling data to Kalimnik, a Russian spy.
SunSeeker
Apr 2019
#54
Using incorrect data to support a hypothesis makes the conclusion less credible
MichMan
Apr 2019
#136
hackers are still there, moe entrenched than ever. People did rise up last time too
robbedvoter
Apr 2019
#151
Meanwhile the head of DHS cries and explains why she just hasnt been correcting it. We dont need sob
Chin music
Apr 2019
#36
It is absolutely ridiculous that we have come this far, and people still try
Baltimike
Apr 2019
#185
Not being contentious but who is 'they'? I would really like to see more discussion. Never have
triron
Apr 2019
#178
What are they saying now? It looks like this issue came up 3 times last week and all 3
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#165
Agreed. The 77k votes needed in those 3 states was just enough to swing the EC to trump.
brush
Apr 2019
#58
Computer hackers are everyday occurrence in USA....does not need Russia or China or India
at140
Apr 2019
#55
+1,000,000 This! And yet SOS's continue to certify computerized "voting" equipment and
diva77
Apr 2019
#128
interesting comparison -- great example to give when trying to explain the forced complexity for
diva77
Apr 2019
#170
"once it is" 93% never ON THE DAY OF COUNT !! ... come on, we know this already
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#166
treason is only in times of war. Assistance given to Russians would probably be conspiracy.
onetexan
Apr 2019
#120
So, we should probably have Gov Andrew Gillum, and a different Senator as well. Recount!
pdsimdars
Apr 2019
#92
if you are interested in election security issues, there's a superb Twitter feed on the subject.
Grasswire2
Apr 2019
#159
Several ways to hack an election are described below. So you think they didn't happen??
triron
Apr 2019
#180
"My goodness! I do wonder if it might be best if we covered this up quickly
struggle4progress
May 2019
#204