Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
19. That's what I said.
Mon May 13, 2019, 01:05 AM
May 2019

It's for historical purposes. But it doesn't solve anything. Trump will still be in office, doing what he does.

Impeachment isn't really a test, IMO. We just need the Dems in the House to vote for it. We already know the Senate won't impeach.

I just hope we don't lose seats in the Senate or House over it. The Republicans did after they impeached Clinton, although they maintained the majority.

Even if we lose seats (and we might not), we still have to impeach. If not for these crimes, then what is impeachment for?

We are in uncharted territory. I think our system was devised, never considering that a President would be a foreign agent, having hired an administration of loyalists to him and the foreign country, and that half of Congress would turn to be loyalists, as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's a matter of time and...»Reply #19