General Discussion

tinrobot

(12,091 posts)

6. He assumes it will be like the Clinton impeachment

Reply to misanthrope (Reply #5)

Fri May 17, 2019, 01:30 AM

May 2019

Which was basically nothing.

His will be about as far away from that as it gets.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who else heard Rachel's remark "why isn't Trump being impeached right now?". [View all] triron May 2019 OP

JUST heard it. elleng May 2019 #1

Good question!! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2019 #2

Rick Wilson? rusty quoin May 2019 #3

tRump wants impeachment because he assumes that it will be a consequence-free, one-sided stopbush May 2019 #4

His assumption is it will further ossify the electorate misanthrope May 2019 #5

He assumes it will be like the Clinton impeachment tinrobot May 2019 #6

And he will get to play the victim. More name calling, bullying and feeding red meat to his base Thekaspervote May 2019 #17

+1 SO true. Chin music May 2019 #43

Fallacious, he's going to do that anyway and historically the party of the impeached has never fared uponit7771 May 2019 #7

2000: GOP won the House, Senate & Presidency crazytown May 2019 #9

Clinton is a democrat ..."the party of the impeached has never fared well" uponit7771 May 2019 #19

Gotcha crazytown May 2019 #21

2000 the SC gave the presidency to Bush. Chin music May 2019 #29

I haven't forgotten crazytown May 2019 #30

So...the impeachment didn't do what you said. Chin music May 2019 #32

Wrong way round. crazytown May 2019 #42

In your mind, not mine. Chin music May 2019 #44

I'm ALL in favor of impeaching MF 45 crazytown May 2019 #46

The 2000 election was not a reflection of impeachment...the 1998 election was brooklynite May 2019 #24

We agree, the 1998 election was horrible for democrats. They got their ass's kicked by a little ... uponit7771 May 2019 #25

Perhaps you should discuss the "success" of the Republican's 1998 campaign with Newt Gingrich... brooklynite May 2019 #34

Newt had a huge scandal at that time, come on people. Bottom line, there is NO ..NONE ... grounded uponit7771 May 2019 #39

Links to Newts Ethic Scandals (link), republicans didn't care about losing 2 nets seats as much as uponit7771 May 2019 #45

Wilson has credibility owing to his long career as a Republican DeminPennswoods May 2019 #23

It's lose/lose: We look weak if we don't, hyper partisan if we do. Funtatlaguy May 2019 #26

I didn't hear her remark, but . . . Richard D May 2019 #8

Maybe just waiting for the Flynn 'tape' and ... Lock him up. May 2019 #10

She's not the only one. calimary May 2019 #11

Why indeed. sandensea May 2019 #12

Fuck him. Chin music May 2019 #31

You know what would be funny? sandensea May 2019 #33

You got that right. I'd be ok w his face in his morning scrambled eggs. Chin music May 2019 #35

Right. They're great at creating distractions sandensea May 2019 #40

Take the political parties, personalities and time frame out of it. Ligyron May 2019 #13

I can only speak for California. One semester of LibDemAlways May 2019 #14

If you think that's bad, spend a few months in a tax funded charter "God" school. Chin music May 2019 #37

..and when I asked them WHY it was mandatory, what would their answer be? brooklynite May 2019 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author SammyWinstonJack May 2019 #15

the goal is to get him out of office and Republicans will not JI7 May 2019 #16

Yes indeed!! Thekaspervote May 2019 #18

She asked Schiff a similar question the other night and he explained it to her StarfishSaver May 2019 #20

for the same broken-record reason mnmoderatedem May 2019 #22

No, not quite... brooklynite May 2019 #36

Or maybe some of them switch to being Democrat, and save their cushy jobs? Chin music May 2019 #41

I did. The answer is most of the Senate repukes have something to rzemanfl May 2019 #27

Anyone who listened. gibraltar72 May 2019 #28