Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,174 posts)

9. Well, that's a curious story at the Financial Times.

Reply to Linda Ed (Reply #8)

Wed May 22, 2019, 07:45 PM

May 2019

Maybe that Deutsche subpoena is connected with some money related matter that Mueller referred on to another US attorney, as he did with the Cohen and campaign finance cases.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congress's case for its subpoena on Deutsche bank was a SLAM DUNK. How do I know? [View all] pnwmom May 2019 OP

Excellent news. iluvtennis May 2019 #1

Yes this is very very very bad for rump and his whole family. They said this will provide quite the UniteFightBack May 2019 #2

That SARS thing is the most surprising thing to me Leith May 2019 #7

I work in the financial industry and that is what they push at every opportunity with all the UniteFightBack May 2019 #11

I Worked At SunTrust When The PATRIOT Act And Sarbanes-Oxley Were Enacted corbettkroehler May 2019 #12

I work in IT for a bank KatyMan May 2019 #15

I know nothing about banking, and this is probably out of the IT area, but just in case pnwmom May 2019 #16

Could have photocopied last week's decision... Wounded Bear May 2019 #3

Sort of like today's hissy fit about cover ups BigmanPigman May 2019 #4

So much for the claim that the only way to get the courts to move quickly StarfishSaver May 2019 #5

So far, my thought that the Judicial Branch would be unlikely pnwmom May 2019 #6

Be interesting to find out Linda Ed May 2019 #8

Well, that's a curious story at the Financial Times. pnwmom May 2019 #9

It was rock solid. herding cats May 2019 #10

That's because the 2 sides filed briefs to the Court previously. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #13

They had also filed briefs previously in the Mazars case, but that judge took a week. pnwmom May 2019 #14

KnR Hekate May 2019 #17

Just like we should have had articles if impeachment Laura PourMeADrink May 2019 #18

In that case the impeachment would look like an entirely partisan action. pnwmom May 2019 #19

I sincerely hope so...because some people are saying Laura PourMeADrink May 2019 #20

Think it may matter whether or not you think Laura PourMeADrink May 2019 #21