Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

.99center

(1,237 posts)
Tue May 28, 2019, 12:31 PM May 2019

The Guardian has viewed documents concerning Mueller's shelved obstruction of justice indictment [View all]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/28/mueller-trump-obstruction-charge-michael-wolff-book-siege-under-fire-news

The Guardian obtained a copy of Siege and viewed the documents concerned.

According to a document seen by the Guardian, the first count, under Title 18, United States code, Section 1505, charged the president with corruptly – or by threats of force or threatening communication – influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding before a department or agency of the United States.

The second count, under section 1512, charged the president with tampering with a witness, victim or informant.

The third count, under section 1513, charged the president with retaliating against a witness, victim or informant.

Wolff writes that the draft indictment he examines says Trump’s attempts to obstruct justice “began on the seventh day of his administration, tracing the line of obstruction from National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s lies to the FBI about his contacts with Russian representative[s], to the president’s efforts to have [FBI director] James Comey protect Flynn, to Comey’s firing, to the president’s efforts to interfere with the special counsel’s investigation, to his attempt to cover up his son and son-in-law’s meeting with Russian governmental agents, to his moves to interfere with Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe’s testimony …”
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hope the Guardian doesn't get burned on this the way they did on the Manafort/Assange enough May 2019 #1
Unnnnn, I'm starting to believe the outlets ... the Cohen story was true but the Mueller team ... uponit7771 May 2019 #2
I don't think that guy represented Mueller. gldstwmn May 2019 #3
Bingo! BadgerMom May 2019 #13
Let's hope this is legit and hope the leak forces more. Grasswire2 May 2019 #4
Keep Dan Rather in mind, though..... nt Grasswire2 May 2019 #5
Good Advice.... ewagner May 2019 #20
I have always believed Dan Rather's words were the truth. They vilified him with the document. usaf-vet May 2019 #23
exactly. Karl Rove got him with a bamboozle. Grasswire2 May 2019 #25
Rec 100 times EveHammond13 May 2019 #6
Holy shit! We all know it happened but to see it written like this is still startling. Pepsidog May 2019 #7
Cowardly Defeatists cautioning we need to move slowly to build a convincing case, in 3,2,1... Fiendish Thingy May 2019 #8
+1 Laura PourMeADrink May 2019 #24
I'll be watching this story closely medyhar May 2019 #9
If this story is true, Mueller also needs to provide the House with a copy of his draft indictment. Lonestarblue May 2019 #10
Very worthy questions. They deserve to be asked AND answered under oath. calimary May 2019 #11
It would also force the GOP to deal with it one way, or another. nt Progressive Jones May 2019 #18
Not Hidden -- just Redacted charliea May 2019 #12
Welcome to DU. Irrelevant? Hardly! lagomorph777 May 2019 #15
Problem is Mueller clearly said today that under the DOJ memo, revealing a sealed indictment would Nevermypresident May 2019 #26
Under oath and in public. BadgerMom May 2019 #14
My bet is Barr Curtis May 2019 #16
It is all tittilating marketing for the new book. debsy May 2019 #17
Wouldn't all of Mueller's electronic files be property of the US Congress? nt Progressive Jones May 2019 #19
Not under the current law. They belong to the DOJ tymorial May 2019 #22
K&R UTUSN May 2019 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Guardian has viewed d...