Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rampartc

(5,835 posts)

4. i can not imagine that the "original intent" of the founders was to make the president unindictable.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Thu May 30, 2019, 03:34 PM

May 2019

and I absolutely think we should test that in court.

at the very least it will prove that these azzwholes are "judicial activists" who really don't care what the founders are supposed to have intended.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yes, I had hard time following Mueller, with his double and triple negatives [View all] question everything May 2019 OP

Mueller really can't bring himself to say Trump committed a crime Blues Heron May 2019 #1

From what I heard of what he said Proud Liberal Dem May 2019 #2

Dude was deliberately ambiguous. It was excruciating to watch him. Chin music May 2019 #6

Right. Also wanted to add that of course, for him impeaching Trump does not pose the threat question everything May 2019 #5

Rules are for Democrats. Chin music May 2019 #3

*Cough* Comey *Cough Proud Liberal Dem May 2019 #8

i can not imagine that the "original intent" of the founders was to make the president unindictable. rampartc May 2019 #4

If the founders had wanted the President to be unindictable they would have said so ElementaryPenguin May 2019 #7

Yet the courts found that Clinton was subject to Paula Jones' Civil Suit Proud Liberal Dem May 2019 #9