General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

52. OK, that makes more sense. That level of detail will require some time digging through searches.

Mon Jun 3, 2019, 11:07 AM

Jun 2019

Now I think you can understand how your OP would be misinterpreted.

Sorry I don't have that level of detail.

If you come across some site tabulating and tracking it all, I hope you will start a new OP about it.

UPDATE: chowder66 posted a list far down the thread
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/house-investigations-trump-his-administration-full-list-n1010131

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Takket Jun 2019 OP

Any minute now. gordianot Jun 2019 #1

Right. SammyWinstonJack Jun 2019 #10

Stop attacking the Dems DownriverDem Jun 2019 #16

OP has a good point. Not a good time for radio silence. Cetacea Jun 2019 #58

It's too complicated for mere mortals to understand watoos Jun 2019 #2

Stop it DownriverDem Jun 2019 #17

Oh but I do, watoos Jun 2019 #43

I see it, watoos Skittles Jun 2019 #73

Check is in the mail,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Jun 2019 #3

Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #4

That ad has been debunked as a false anti-Democratic Party ad. You know that. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #28

every step is challenged by trump in the courts, democrats MUST start proceedings against Barr right beachbum bob Jun 2019 #5

Swallwell in CNN town hall last night chooses Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #6

totally correct idea, start the inquiries and reveal all direct to the american people, then beachbum bob Jun 2019 #7

Maybe an ethics hearing The Wizard Jun 2019 #9

Hello? DownriverDem Jun 2019 #13

why you start with Barr as all attemps to obstruct will be clear obstruction and the democrats can beachbum bob Jun 2019 #15

What about the fact that they had 4 years before the next election, without Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #21

Who had 4 years? The Republicans? The Republicans are in on Trump's criminality. Co-conspirators.nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #31

The people investigating Watergate JHB Jun 2019 #44

Agree! Just opining on differences between Watergate Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #48

Oh, I see. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #59

You can answer all your questions by reading. Your implication is not legitimate. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #8

Thank you DownriverDem Jun 2019 #12

I don't think anyone chooses to attack anyone. But Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #30

I'm not implying anything. I just want to know. Takket Jun 2019 #14

OK, that makes more sense. That level of detail will require some time digging through searches. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #52

Exactly. You have to be pretty uninformed & not paying attention to think they're doing nothing. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #34

+1 Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2019 #53

reading! reading? ha! certainot Jun 2019 #38

Just because you want it now DownriverDem Jun 2019 #11

Are we not allowed to have a different opinion on an issue? watoos Jun 2019 #22

they're playing mulit-dimensional chess, watoos! Skittles Jun 2019 #74

I don't know, maybe, watoos Jun 2019 #18

What ever happened in the SDNY, haven't heard doc03 Jun 2019 #19

Barr is now in charge of those investigations. watoos Jun 2019 #23

The talking heads on MSNBC said it was a state doc03 Jun 2019 #27

SDNY is the Southern District of New York - headed by a US Attorney who answers to Barr EffieBlack Jun 2019 #32

So we are screwed again! doc03 Jun 2019 #67

No. We're not EffieBlack Jun 2019 #68

I haven't heard anything about the state of NY for weeks either nt doc03 Jun 2019 #69

Your not hearing about it doesn't mean nothing's happening EffieBlack Jun 2019 #70

All I hear is talk about impeachment and we all know it is not going to happen. nt doc03 Jun 2019 #71

You're probably not hearing about every criminal investigation occurring in each of the 50 states EffieBlack Jun 2019 #72

The leaders in the House aren't going to issue a status report daily or weekly. They shouldn't. George II Jun 2019 #20

Why? watoos Jun 2019 #24

Why don't they just invite trump and McConnell into their private meetings, too? George II Jun 2019 #35

Because they're more interested in doing it right than in keeping a small portion of EffieBlack Jun 2019 #36

I wish they would give daily updates. spanone Jun 2019 #29

Me too. All the public is seeing probably looks like a Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #37

trump is daily pumping out 'no collusion no obstruction' I'd like some counter punching spanone Jun 2019 #39

Hell ya !!! Wish more of our candidates would weigh in Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #42

Patience Katinfl Jun 2019 #25

I know about the financial records & taxes. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #26

Hopeful, but remembering that the revelation that Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #41

I think one thing they'll be going after, and looking at.... Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #60

You're right. Oh, didn't realize we had only asked Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #61

I'm thinking the criminal money would have been laundered. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #62

Here's the request for tax returns. Scroll Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #65

This is the thing that scares me, honestly scares me Bettie Jun 2019 #63

That's the million dollar question. If he can't be indicted, then what? Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #64

I think the Marshals will enforce a contempt of court order StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #66

They are on break for Memorial Day, home talking to constituents. shraby Jun 2019 #33

just pretend its 1930's Italy & you're trying to bring Mussolini up on charges yaesu Jun 2019 #40

Or worse than that. Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #45

Yep, if there are historians 50 years from now watoos Jun 2019 #46

Yup, his obstruction, outlined by Mueller didnt Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #49

It is hard to keep up-- Lulu KC Jun 2019 #47

Here's a list. I googled and posted in 4 seconds.... chowder66 Jun 2019 #50

Wow! Thank You! Duppers Jun 2019 #51

Most impressive! procon Jun 2019 #54

Good work! . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #55

EXCELLENT! StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #56

I made a standalone post in GD and listed everything. nt chowder66 Jun 2019 #57

thank you!!!! Takket Jun 2019 #76

See at link Hekate Jun 2019 #75

thank you too. Takket Jun 2019 #77