Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. The artist's opinions are rarely relevant
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 05:36 PM
Aug 2012

While an artist may object to the use of the work in a particular setting, it is usually the case that the recording is included in a licensing service which the copyright owner, even if the artist is the copyright owner, has authorized to grant package licenses for public performances.

That may, or may not, be the case here, but it is a typical arrangement that one pays a single fee to RIAA or ASCAP for use of a work for a public event, because the copyright owner of the recording has agreed to license through those agencies.

If you want to play Pink Floyd recordings at a public event, Roger Waters' opinion doesn't enter into the picture, since the licensing agent for those recordings is EMI:

http://www.emimusic.com/openemi/basic-rights/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did they play PINK FLOYD ...»Reply #6