Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ************Thread 3 Mueller Hearing************** [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)48. Jeffries is good.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It works both ways though, it does allow dems to state the report ... that's a good thing
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#10
There was certainly a very important confirmation of a key question by Richmond.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#13
Dems certainly are pointing a laser on McGahn (obstruction of justice/suborning perjury).
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#9
+1, it looks like they're laser locked. They should just keep repeating NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#12
I must be on a delayed feed. Just heard Richmond close with those six words.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#15
LOFL !! gonna use that one ... Mueller isn't even listening to him now ... stupid ass'd Gaetz
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#21
BACK TO OoJ !!! Nice Jefferies, start out with what you're going to tell them, tell them then tell
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#39
Unlike a lot of Democrats on the Committee, Jeffries is layering an argument.
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#53
I got distracted at work. Did Mueller disavow Jeffries' analysis at the end?
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#57
Buck waltzed right through that door. Bet that wasn't within his marching orders.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#75
Yep. That was pretty clear from the initial report, but Buck just walked Mueller through it
fishwax
Jul 2019
#78
this Biggs line of questioning is odd -- I gues he's trying to lay the groundwork for
fishwax
Jul 2019
#87
Buck: "You believeyou could charge.. the President with obstruction of justice after he left office"
riversedge
Jul 2019
#90
Yep, this is at the heart of everything...whether or not you can indict a sitting President.
cbdo2007
Jul 2019
#101
Referring to the report instead of reading it saves time and enters actual report into the record.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#114
Mueller made Lieu read it. No time was saved, Mueller saved himself from having to put his voice
dem4decades
Jul 2019
#121
Reading in a sinister motive. No need. Well known that Mueller is nervous public speaker. He
emmaverybo
Jul 2019
#135
Is it true that the reason you did not indict DJT is because of the OLC memo? Yes.
demmiblue
Jul 2019
#124
Not sure why he asserts that. I don't think the constitutionality of the memo..
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#111
The OLC memo opines that it would be unconstitutional. It's never been tested in court,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#123
At this point, republicans are basically admitting the report has all sorts of damning info about
fishwax
Jul 2019
#132
Whoever follows her, needs to make the point that actually firing Mueller
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#141
Yep. Jayapal should have rebutted Lesko before going into her first question.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#149