Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ************Thread 3 Mueller Hearing************** [View all]Pacifist Patriot
(25,215 posts)114. Referring to the report instead of reading it saves time and enters actual report into the record.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It works both ways though, it does allow dems to state the report ... that's a good thing
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#10
There was certainly a very important confirmation of a key question by Richmond.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#13
Dems certainly are pointing a laser on McGahn (obstruction of justice/suborning perjury).
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#9
+1, it looks like they're laser locked. They should just keep repeating NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#12
I must be on a delayed feed. Just heard Richmond close with those six words.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#15
LOFL !! gonna use that one ... Mueller isn't even listening to him now ... stupid ass'd Gaetz
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#21
BACK TO OoJ !!! Nice Jefferies, start out with what you're going to tell them, tell them then tell
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#39
Unlike a lot of Democrats on the Committee, Jeffries is layering an argument.
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#53
I got distracted at work. Did Mueller disavow Jeffries' analysis at the end?
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#57
Buck waltzed right through that door. Bet that wasn't within his marching orders.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#75
Yep. That was pretty clear from the initial report, but Buck just walked Mueller through it
fishwax
Jul 2019
#78
this Biggs line of questioning is odd -- I gues he's trying to lay the groundwork for
fishwax
Jul 2019
#87
Buck: "You believeyou could charge.. the President with obstruction of justice after he left office"
riversedge
Jul 2019
#90
Yep, this is at the heart of everything...whether or not you can indict a sitting President.
cbdo2007
Jul 2019
#101
Referring to the report instead of reading it saves time and enters actual report into the record.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#114
Mueller made Lieu read it. No time was saved, Mueller saved himself from having to put his voice
dem4decades
Jul 2019
#121
Reading in a sinister motive. No need. Well known that Mueller is nervous public speaker. He
emmaverybo
Jul 2019
#135
Is it true that the reason you did not indict DJT is because of the OLC memo? Yes.
demmiblue
Jul 2019
#124
Not sure why he asserts that. I don't think the constitutionality of the memo..
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#111
The OLC memo opines that it would be unconstitutional. It's never been tested in court,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#123
At this point, republicans are basically admitting the report has all sorts of damning info about
fishwax
Jul 2019
#132
Whoever follows her, needs to make the point that actually firing Mueller
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#141
Yep. Jayapal should have rebutted Lesko before going into her first question.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 2019
#149