Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)

12. That's why I was asking

Reply to drray23 (Reply #11)

Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:06 PM

Jul 2019

The most likely reason for something that doesn’t sound legally correct (from someone like Mueller)... is that he didn’t actually say what you thought you heard.

Here’s what I found so far:

"You would not indict because under the OLC opinion a sitting president cannot be indicted. It's unconstitutional," Mr. Mueller said in response to questions from Mr. Nadler.

That would be easy to mid-hear. But it isn’t a statement that going against the OLC opinion would be unconstitutional... it’s an accurate description of the OLC’s opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why did Mueller say that going against the olc opinion would be unconstitutional? [View all] drray23 Jul 2019 OP

Ultimately the Supreme Court is the final authority but everyone can have their own belief... PoliticAverse Jul 2019 #1

Where does he say that? FBaggins Jul 2019 #2

He explicitly said so during the hearing. drray23 Jul 2019 #5

Again... can you point to where? FBaggins Jul 2019 #7

I heard him say it as well. Nevermypresident Jul 2019 #10

I was listening on Sirius xm driving to work. drray23 Jul 2019 #11

That's why I was asking FBaggins Jul 2019 #12

Found the transcript. drray23 Jul 2019 #13

As I said above... that's not at all what you described FBaggins Jul 2019 #16

Because at this time there is no legal authority to the contrary. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2019 #3

Did he use the word unconstitutional? Claritie Pixie Jul 2019 #4

Yes explicitly which is what surprised me.nt. drray23 Jul 2019 #6

I didn't hear that, thanks. Claritie Pixie Jul 2019 #8

I don't think he put it that way, elleng Jul 2019 #9

the Constitution provides a way to convict a President Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #14

He didn't specifically say that EffieBlack Jul 2019 #15