Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2019, 03:13 PM Nov 2019

Breaking - Testimony: White House lawyer (Eisenberg) told Vindman not to discuss Ukraine call [View all]

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/11/01/white-house-vindman-ukraine-call-063892

The senior White House lawyer who placed a record of President Donald Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine’s president in a top-secret system also instructed at least one official who heard the call not to tell anyone about it, according to testimony heard by House impeachment investigators this week.

...

Eisenberg recorded Vindman’s complaints in notes on a yellow legal pad, then conferred with his deputy Michael Ellis about how to handle the conversation because it was clearly “sensitive,” Vindman testified. The lawyers then decided to move the record of the call into the NSC’s top-secret codeword system—a server normally used to store highly classified material that only a small group of officials can access.

Vindman did not consider the move itself as evidence of a cover-up, according to a person familiar with his testimony. But he said he became disturbed when, a few days later, Eisenberg instructed him not to tell anyone about the call—especially because it was Vindman’s job to coordinate the interagency process with regard to Ukraine policy.

Eisenberg’s decision to move the call record to the codeword system following his conversation with Vindman was first reported by The Washington Post. But Eisenberg’s subsequent request that Vindman not disclose the content of the call to anyone has not been previously reported.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R, Another one of Trump associated lawyers needs a lawyer. Trump is stupid, he could've done the uponit7771 Nov 2019 #1
I have always had some uncertainty about Eisenberg principals Botany Nov 2019 #2
i think i got it dweller Nov 2019 #3
So does that mean we can't know both how fast Trump will be impeached The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #6
Impeachment is a fixed and a given. Botany Nov 2019 #9
Russia hacked the RNC servers too. Kompromat for everyone! OMGWTF Nov 2019 #13
Ha! Roland99 Nov 2019 #7
I got it, even though I am a literature person, so should be *uncertain*--but I read a lot of SF. nt tblue37 Nov 2019 #11
His actions have created great uncertainty, that's for sure. LastDemocratInSC Nov 2019 #19
Schrodinger's Call. WheelWalker Nov 2019 #20
Eisenberg compensators Cary Nov 2019 #24
Yea, but I'm not sure. Maraya1969 Nov 2019 #26
YEAH - msnbc keeps saying he's going to give deposition on Monday, but I can't find confirmation Leghorn21 Nov 2019 #4
Lawyers whose lawyers need lawyers. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #5
Makes me think about all the psychologists/etc. who need psych.... erronis Nov 2019 #16
"sensitive" central scrutinizer Nov 2019 #8
So this means that call transcript gets subpoenaed right? docgee Nov 2019 #10
As well as the "yellow pad" notes. WheelWalker Nov 2019 #21
Coverup. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2019 #12
Oh come on! Just haul that ahole in front of the bar for multiple ethics violations infullview Nov 2019 #14
Eisenberg's deputy is Michael Ellis??? Grins Nov 2019 #15
What you do expect them to do when the bottom of the barrel is just slime? erronis Nov 2019 #17
It's interesting that lawyers made the decision to bury this call. patphil Nov 2019 #18
Does this mean that they can't get back into it and mess with evidence without NSC cooperation? NBachers Nov 2019 #22
My guess is that any modifications to documents stored on that server patphil Nov 2019 #29
"Oops. Harry used the only backup floppy for a coffee coaster." Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #30
You just pegged yourself as an old guy. patphil Nov 2019 #31
hey, it's the gubmint. at least they upgraded from cassette Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #32
My first computer was a Commodore Pet, and it had a cassette. patphil Nov 2019 #33
What sort of actions can the ABA or locals take against all these lawyers who evade the law Karadeniz Nov 2019 #23
They KNEW it was a QUID PRO QUO...and proceeded to COVER IT UP spanone Nov 2019 #25
Eisenberg! Come on down! BootinUp Nov 2019 #27
Oops! Blue Owl Nov 2019 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - Testimony: Whi...