General Discussion

triron

(22,240 posts)

40. That's what I thought. So if I were any of those called to testify I might very well jump at that

Reply to tblue37 (Reply #22)

Tue Nov 5, 2019, 06:04 PM

Nov 2019

offer. Sure sounds like a good deal for them. So why show up?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Schiff may make a separate impeachment charge for those not [View all] BigmanPigman Nov 2019 OP

They side with a traitor. Kid Berwyn Nov 2019 #1

Scorched Earth! Don't mess around with these criminals!!! ffr Nov 2019 #2

Chew their traitorous asses up. Pepsidog Nov 2019 #3

+1. No mercy. dalton99a Nov 2019 #4

Both. Contempt of Congress. maxsolomon Nov 2019 #5

+1 Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #23

Is there a list of the folks that didnt show up today but who were called? RT Atlanta Nov 2019 #6

Here you go... They are all close to tRump. BigmanPigman Nov 2019 #8

Schiff needs to announce an Official Amnesty Deadline... MartyTheGreek Nov 2019 #7

That sounds like a really good idea. Not sure if he can, but it would compel info. to come forward? Evolve Dammit Nov 2019 #17

Great idea. Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #24

Excellent idea!!! If it can be done. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2019 #33

Schiff said he likely won't take it to court but will make it a charge to add to the list. erlewyne Nov 2019 #9

Yes! But wish he would drop the word "may" Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #25

Good, thanks Rep. Schiff. Mc Mike Nov 2019 #10

A second charge to add to the list? But what consequences are there for them? Maraya1969 Nov 2019 #11

I fear DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #15

Yes .. likely dead end...but I think so what! Theres Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #26

With today's DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #43

They didn't uncover it. It was posted by Spectator US Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #44

He means expanding obstruction of justice charges against Trump, I believe. nt tblue37 Nov 2019 #22

That's what I thought. So if I were any of those called to testify I might very well jump at that triron Nov 2019 #40

Democrats should be throwing the book at these uncooperative witnesses. LiberalLovinLug Nov 2019 #32

I'm with you. triron Nov 2019 #41

Randi Rhodes bdamomma Nov 2019 #12

I miss Randi from Air America. What channel/ network is she on? Evolve Dammit Nov 2019 #18

Listen to Randi 3:00-5:00 ET at sueh Nov 2019 #19

Thanks! Evolve Dammit Nov 2019 #38

I have been calling for RICO investigation of the GOP/RNC for 2 decades... IthinkThereforeIAM Nov 2019 #29

I think arresting just one of them would make some changes. TNNurse Nov 2019 #13

Just one bdamomma Nov 2019 #20

These people made an issue out of a tan suit. Time Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #27

Exactly!!!! "Organized crime syndicate. !!!!!!" RKP5637 Nov 2019 #34

you bet gop would start arresting AlexSFCA Nov 2019 #14

Add it to the list and explain the details to those capable of rational thought. Evolve Dammit Nov 2019 #16

and very short memories too. bdamomma Nov 2019 #21

Absolutely. And that lack of doing ANYTHING to benefit ANYONE except the rich is not covered by MSM. Evolve Dammit Nov 2019 #39

I thought only the prez and VP can be impeached, and the rest get indicted. I read that somewhere. ancianita Nov 2019 #28

I think they're adding these cases to the 'separate' obstruction of Congress Lock him up. Nov 2019 #30

That's my point. "Lock 'em up" can't happen in this situation unless Dems are willing to do ancianita Nov 2019 #36

Adam Schiff IcyPeas Nov 2019 #31

He's amazing to have the temperament to put up with all of the republican bullshit. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2019 #35

Impeach all of them. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #37

Hear, hear! BigmanPigman Nov 2019 #42