Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ****Live Impeachment hearing - THREAD 2**** [View all]The_Counsel
(1,757 posts)66. I'm Sure the GOP Counsel Will Focus on Him a Lot When the Time Comes.
The Dems have no real use for Turley other than as a whipping boy.
No need to come off as complete bullies. At least not right away anyway...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He made and continued to make arguments that were counter to the GOP narrative.
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#123
Motion from GOP to bring in the whistleblower and voting to table (I think motion from Armstrong)
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#2
Motion tabled. 45 minutes of questions from Chair/Ranking member & counsels. Nadler starts
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#6
Glad to see Nadler question witnesses in order to more highly amplify their statements' key points.
ancianita
Dec 2019
#10
I must say, I mam shocked by Turley's statements. I always repected him as a very inteligent
napi21
Dec 2019
#43
As good as the witnesses are, I applaud the excellent questions chosen for them so far.
crickets
Dec 2019
#12
And cut him off from trying to move a goal post by telling him it was a yes or no question
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#24
Me,too. Can't WAIT for Rethugs to DARE ask Karlan ANYTHING. She'll have their balls.
ancianita
Dec 2019
#23
She is a professor at Stanford and an appellate attorney (according to CSPAN)
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#33
This is a lot of time being spent on discussing betrayal of national security.
crickets
Dec 2019
#32
Each side (for the initial round with Chair/Ranking member) gets 45 minutes
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#44
This is Norm Eisen - the counsel for the Democrats on the Judiciary committee
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#45
That's because Karlan is bringing the whole concept to light with her passion
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#48
Eisen questions driving home that "not carrying out an illegal act" doesn't mean you didn't commit
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#55
it's not even about "pursuing dirt", it's about claiming there's an investigation
Hermit-The-Prog
Dec 2019
#83
**** Eisen done - 10 MINUTE RECESS*** will pickup with the GOP when they return
BumRushDaShow
Dec 2019
#73
If it's so "cold in the hearing room," maybe Gym Jordan should find a coat somewhere.
Gidney N Cloyd
Dec 2019
#102
BSing usually is not as compelling as sincerity. Turley's trying to put on a show, but
crickets
Dec 2019
#116
From the start of his speechifying: Turkey/Turley didn't have a robust exchange
Mersky
Dec 2019
#119