Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,406 posts)
11. Sheriff Bob...
Thu Dec 19, 2019, 09:06 AM
Dec 2019


Sounds like a great idea!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

a "speedy trial" can take years for many alleged criminals rampartc Dec 2019 #1
Lawrence Tribe says ramblin_dave Dec 2019 #2
Seems like no big problem for the Speaker. 'cons need speed more than Dems. empedocles Dec 2019 #4
'Immediately' ? empedocles Dec 2019 #3
Immediately is relative. C_U_L8R Dec 2019 #5
How about editing out the offensive word in the first line. Ms. Toad Dec 2019 #6
Then I would have to remove the smiley face? kentuck Dec 2019 #9
So it's OK if I refer to someone as a N***R, as long as I put a smiley face? Ms. Toad Dec 2019 #31
You have "immediately" in quotes. What are you quoting? onenote Dec 2019 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author kentuck Dec 2019 #10
No. It's not in the Constitution StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #18
Thanks for the info. kentuck Dec 2019 #21
holding back AND getting subpeonas enforced needs to Pelosi #1 goal now beachbumbob Dec 2019 #8
Sheriff Bob... kentuck Dec 2019 #11
Pelosi and democrats have to GO FOR BLOOD ON THIS and the only way is beachbumbob Dec 2019 #13
Interesting. kentuck Dec 2019 #14
I think further investigations could reveal "conspiracy" and that could lead to a 3rd article beachbumbob Dec 2019 #16
Yes. I saw a Rick Wilson video on the MSNBC site a couple of days ago. democrank Dec 2019 #15
Merrick Garland BuffaloJackalope Dec 2019 #12
The Constitution does not require the House to "immediately" refer Articles to the Senate StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #17
Thanks for that clarification SS! kentuck Dec 2019 #20
This is exactly the stance she took last night. Sogo Dec 2019 #23
She so clearly had this in her quiver all along and sprung it at just the right time StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #24
My goodness... MontanaMama Dec 2019 #26
The Notorious Madame Speaker!!! Sogo Dec 2019 #30
Whatever the constitutional challenge may be, I'm damned glad Nancy Pelosi is behind the wheel Mr. Ected Dec 2019 #19
She's working it, isn't she? StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #22
She isn't required by law to do anything there's no timeline povided Fullduplexxx Dec 2019 #25
Someone show me where it says "immediately" in the Constitution. Cattledog Dec 2019 #27
That is not a law but senate rules...the house makes their own rule...and SCOTUS has no say. Demsrule86 Dec 2019 #28
Also, it is a mistake to appeal to a right wing supreme court...Roberts is but one vote. Demsrule86 Dec 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #11