Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL THREAD 6**** [View all]BumRushDaShow
(170,430 posts)89. Exactly!
Impeachment hearings/trials (and actually any hearings) ARE "boring" (really) and the media hypes them up and then has the talking heads tear them down... and the public eventually tunes out.
For Democrats, it was pretty much "do or die" with the assumption that this might be their only chance to not only get the info to the public but to their own Senators, many of who have not or could not get into the minutia of the House inquiry (and thus needed enough compiled info to talk to constituents about). And it was made worse by Turtle continually changing the Rules resolution on-the-fly in order to ram it through like he's done those judges.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jeffries giving closing debate arguments for the Schumer Amendment to subpoena Mulvaney
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#1
OMG Jeffries..."If you don't know now you know". Younger folks will appreciate that. nt
UniteFightBack
Jan 2020
#6
Schiff done. Turtle up. Motion to table the Amendment. Roll Call to table.
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#7
Good. Every single one of those rethuglican, criminal supporting traitors needs
ecstatic
Jan 2020
#18
Schumer has submited another Amendment - subpoena to Secretary of Defense
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#22
Schiff's time has been handed to Jason Crow (D-CO) to argue for this Amendment.
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#24
Let's work the fuck out of these whiny bitches and their whiner counsel, Cipollone.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#33
It appears to me that Dems are laying out a case, and the Republicans are not able to cross
mzmolly
Jan 2020
#34
Americans are seeing this, too. What lazy blaming, complaining whiners these Senator and counel are.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#44
A few mins ago, Crow said that DoD had until Aug 6 to effectively spend the Ukrainian funds on time
Mersky
Jan 2020
#35
Schiff: "If it's just abstract, then they can't argue the facts, then it's just some generic thing
Mersky
Jan 2020
#45
GO HARD, ADAM. Damn right we won't make it easy for them to say no to the American people!
ancianita
Jan 2020
#49
Schumer submitting another Amendment to subpoena Robert P. Blair/Michael P. Duffy
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#58
The clerk, like the Senate that sits on their graveyard of House bills, isn't used to working.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#80
Roberts just said there were 2 hours to discuss this next amendment. It's 10:40 on the east coast.
napi21
Jan 2020
#74
Roberts is scheduled to hear arguments in the Supreme Court tomorrow morning.
PA Democrat
Jan 2020
#82
That's 1 hour per side and the GOP hasn't spent more than maybe 15 - 20 minutes for their arguments.
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#90