Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ******* Impeachment Live Thread 1 - 1/25 ******* [View all]ancianita
(36,017 posts)13. But. We had better listen to it in order to disprove it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ditto... I am having trouble even thinking about watching... I'll read the threads for awhile
hlthe2b
Jan 2020
#17
Cippy wants to frame this as an ALT-evidence defense AND how dangerous the House is
ancianita
Jan 2020
#9
The only way to smash this drumbeat claim for the next 10 months is make it part of elevator pitch
ancianita
Jan 2020
#34
Agreed totally! Will try to listen on the radio and contribute what I can n/t
DonaldsRump
Jan 2020
#114
The radio's a great way to filter out histrionics, but it also deprives one of body/facial language.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#117
I'm just curious to find out just what it takes to buy the soul of a Republican Senator
Arkansas Granny
Jan 2020
#41
And they certainly don't want to hear that they're cowering cowards either.
dem4decades
Jan 2020
#79
+1, the judicial system is lacking on this issue. It shouldn't take 123432 years to get a ruling ...
uponit7771
Jan 2020
#48
lol ... they gonna show Wonderful World Of Gumball next ?! Cause we can't tell that's a cartoon 🙄🙄
uponit7771
Jan 2020
#42
The full breadth and scope of this argument will be behind the next 10 months of Republican message
ancianita
Jan 2020
#45
The first two speakers have spoken of the REAL TRANSCRIPT -- but they NEVER gave us a transcript
karynnj
Jan 2020
#46
If they have a tape, they do - they seem to prefer having their version CALLED a transcript
karynnj
Jan 2020
#100
They have both the secret server and original transcript in Russian control.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#115
So it's all about "TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT", which is a COMPLETE lie,
bullwinkle428
Jan 2020
#50
If anyone is using that phrase as part of a drinking game, I hope the ambulance is
bullwinkle428
Jan 2020
#70
I hear you. They've got alt-science and alt-reality and are ready to go all in on the 17th Century.
ancianita
Jan 2020
#96
They disagree.They own "alt-intelligence."Our labels for them roll off authoritarian followers' back
ancianita
Jan 2020
#107
It'll take 1,000s of lawyers' joint deposition to disprove this to millions of this "ALT" mentality
ancianita
Jan 2020
#113
+1, they aren't even trying ... f ck it ... they might as well read all of Trumps tweets that would
uponit7771
Jan 2020
#65
So this is a bunch of Trump talking points that they add details to?! Might as well showed Gumball !
uponit7771
Jan 2020
#61
Whoa. Is some lying crap: tRump didn't do an unprecedented thing declassifying the call
Mersky
Jan 2020
#71
So they are going to insist that the transcript deals with corruption even though corruption was
Arkansas Granny
Jan 2020
#75
What a bunch of BS - trying to claim that the conversation of 7/25 w/ Zelensky about
Pachamama
Jan 2020
#87
Call your senators and tell them you know how false/insulting the republican defense is this morning
Mersky
Jan 2020
#89
Now 53 traitorous self serving assholes are staying in their seats listening and taking notes
Pachamama
Jan 2020
#110
What does that mean? The Democrats are based on fact, not so much with the Republicans.
dem4decades
Jan 2020
#166
At 5 minutes in my blood was already at the boiling point but I will listen to all of their
in2herbs
Jan 2020
#108
Okay. Hold it. They're using the "hearsay/no facts" testimonies from Schiff's hearings???
underpants
Jan 2020
#116
Power & deals for them, hearsay for Americans. "What you are seeing and reading is not what's happen
ancianita
Jan 2020
#138
Who was he talking about? I heard Laura Crap, then I heard Laura Cooper a little further
Mersky
Jan 2020
#137
+1, they might as well just read Trump tweets ... they make more sense and that says something
uponit7771
Jan 2020
#142
He's done his completely offtopic nonsenical argument - now to Pat Philbin
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#157