Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
21. I suspect the impeachment rules prohibit objections. I haven't watched the trial because I stomach
Sun Jan 26, 2020, 01:45 PM
Jan 2020

the lies. If objections were permitted I suspect the Republicans would have disrupted the Dems presentation like they tried to do in the House impeachment hearings. However, while I’m sure Roberts doesn’t want to put his thumb on scale, the Constitution provides that the Chief Justice of SCOTUS “preside” over the trial. In my view that gives him broad authority to do what he wants. I don’t practice in Federal court other than bankruptcy proceedings, but Federal judges can do pretty much whatever they want. Roberts sitting silent while Republicans spew lie after lie is disturbing. You are correct, Republican arguments over process are not disputes over the facts for a jury to determine. They are just lies that subvert the rule of law, our democracy and Roberts not correcting the record or calling out the Republicans is unforgivable. He is doing as much damage to our country as the Republicans. Roberts is as complicit as the Republicans at this point. Roberts could do so much to restore confidence in our legal system but chooses not to. If he called out the lies being told about the process the Republicans could do nothing, zero about it. Like Trump, Roberts is untouchable. Dems aren’t going to agree to impeachment proceedings against him for calling out Republican lies so why he sits silent is a testament of what a coward he is.

Of course it is bullshit . . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #1
Me thinks that Team Trump's argument was for an audience of the following: Botany Jan 2020 #2
I think that your list 1-3 could be summarized by saying "the RW mentally challenged among us. usaf-vet Jan 2020 #12
Agreed. c-rational Jan 2020 #16
Come on now. The Scarsdale Jan 2020 #10
of course handmade34 Jan 2020 #3
If this was a real trial then a lawyer like Adam Schiff would have objected to the false arguments. Botany Jan 2020 #4
if I spread lies in court like republicans I would be disbarred. There is no factual dispute that Pepsidog Jan 2020 #18
Once again all I see beside the blatant lies by the Trump/GOP lawyers is that the only thing they... Botany Jan 2020 #20
I suspect the impeachment rules prohibit objections. I haven't watched the trial because I stomach Pepsidog Jan 2020 #21
I think that the repubs know that the demographics.. Botany Jan 2020 #23
They all lie malaise Jan 2020 #5
It Is All Flaunting The Law And The Constitution colsohlibgal Jan 2020 #6
Is Chief Justice Roberts numbed by experiencing firsthand Hortensis Jan 2020 #7
Time for Roberts to weigh in? TheRickles Jan 2020 #9
Roberts could exert enormous influence in this process. Who is going to stop him? Hard to believe he Pepsidog Jan 2020 #17
As that slimebag 2naSalit Jan 2020 #8
Putin sits back and smirks. Scarsdale Jan 2020 #13
Strange isn't it - all those Repukes can cite the 2nd Amendment word for word packman Jan 2020 #11
Laws and decency are only Scarsdale Jan 2020 #14
Great point.My wife asks will it ever be back to normal and I say yes when Dems are back in control. Pepsidog Jan 2020 #19
Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2020 #15
K&R! n/t PandoraAwakened Jan 2020 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Norm Ornstein ... on the ...»Reply #21