Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Drumpf attorney Jane Raskin is continuing the defense and has focused on Ghouliani BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #1
Apparently Dems have portrayed Rudy's behavior in an unfair context. crickets Jan 2020 #2
Yes! They pounded the table even!!1111!!!! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #5
that proves it right there bdamomma Jan 2020 #25
Yea, she said there was shouting and table Karma13612 Jan 2020 #86
She just quoted that debunked Conspiracy Theory pushed by that malaise Jan 2020 #7
Hey GOP! Rudy isn't the one on trial here. GoCubsGo Jan 2020 #26
Is this finally Rudy's underbussing? dpibel Jan 2020 #3
Jane anti-Raskin. dchill Jan 2020 #4
In her ghouliani can do no wrong Watchfoxheadexplodes Jan 2020 #6
If only someone could play the latest clip from Fox and Friends... crickets Jan 2020 #13
Is Raskiin throwing Ghouliani under the bus? Pachamama Jan 2020 #8
Rudy Mossfern Jan 2020 #9
Raskin is done and Suckylow is up - to supposedly introduce the next one to discuss "the law" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #10
'The Law,' now. elleng Jan 2020 #11
And now Patrick Philbin is up to supposedly discuss "the law" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #12
I'm trying to remember H2O Man Jan 2020 #51
Fred Rogers BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #66
I'm not sure ..... H2O Man Jan 2020 #95
Philbin sounds like some of my professors in college at140 Jan 2020 #60
Whoa. Up is down, black is white, Clarence Darrow had rudy in mind. Mersky Jan 2020 #14
evil lawyer Bill Nye Kali Jan 2020 #15
LOL Mersky Jan 2020 #18
WTF is he talking about BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #16
What utter BS now about right to counsel and cross examination crickets Jan 2020 #22
You nailed it. Karma13612 Jan 2020 #96
Wow! The law part is just as limp if not limper than the constitutional stuff. hedda_foil Jan 2020 #17
It's not just "limp". It's completely bogus. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #19
How this fellow does not expire of embarrassment, I will never understand. crickets Jan 2020 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Mersky Jan 2020 #20
I think that was an old clip BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #21
Was it? I couldn't exactly tell. I thought it was scalia? Mersky Jan 2020 #24
It was Nadler. crickets Jan 2020 #30
He mentioned Nadler's name after the clip got gummed up. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #32
Ah, heck, okay Mersky Jan 2020 #36
Thankfully I don't think CSPAN2 put up any pic of Scalia when the name came up earlier. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #39
Wow, I guess so!😮 Karma13612 Jan 2020 #103
You have a strong stomach bdamomma Jan 2020 #23
So he's making the case Mossfern Jan 2020 #27
Smoke and mirrors Watchfoxheadexplodes Jan 2020 #31
you have to have blinders on and your lips attatched to an orange butt cheek to understand Kali Jan 2020 #34
This level of projection is actually making the Democrats' case in some spots. crickets Jan 2020 #35
blah blah blah due process Kali Jan 2020 #29
They have no defense . . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #33
Since when does the OMB tell the House how to crickets Jan 2020 #37
It's the UNITARY EXECUTIVE BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #42
Gotcha. I thought I smelled Bill Barr in there somewhere. nt crickets Jan 2020 #48
omg claiming committees not authorized! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #38
I really hope that someone can get thousands of lawyers to sign a letter BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #40
I do not envy Con law professors right now. crickets Jan 2020 #50
That would be the perfect exercise and assignment BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #54
This is the old practice of baffling them with bullshit. I would dare any Magat ooky Jan 2020 #41
name change needed: Phildabinwidbullshit Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #45
ZACLY!!! elleng Jan 2020 #72
only PBS left locally while Full-o-bull Philbin natters on Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #43
listing all the ways they obstructed Kali Jan 2020 #44
This idiot has yet to say that Drumpf did NOT assert "Executive Privilege" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #46
I was out for a while. Did he say something about negotiating testimony? nolabear Jan 2020 #47
as it related to their stupid claim of no due process Kali Jan 2020 #49
They're going to hurt themselves twisting like that. nolabear Jan 2020 #52
sure hope so Kali Jan 2020 #55
And his talking about "agency lawyers" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #53
I swear the last slide was essentially saying on behalf of Trump crickets Jan 2020 #56
did Phul-a-bull just say the founding was in 1796? Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #57
Yes, he did. crickets Jan 2020 #64
1796 twas the 3rd presidential election. he brain-deaded his own silly self. Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #69
gee 3 years in is "jumping straight to impeachment"? Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #58
It is 4:15 ET right now. Anyone know about how long until the next break? hlthe2b Jan 2020 #59
I *think* I heard 'til 6pm. nt blaze Jan 2020 #62
The House becomes supreme BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #61
Right now I am reading Federalist 51 crickets Jan 2020 #70
I know I need a nap BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #73
I've been checking in now and again and have yet to hear any defense. Vinca Jan 2020 #63
There is no defense for trump... so they're attacking the process. blaze Jan 2020 #65
They aren't just attacking the process BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #75
My husband has been wondering why Roberts doesn't say something when stuff like that comes up. Vinca Jan 2020 #108
A Senate Impeachment trial is not really like a "court of law" BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #109
LOL! Kali Jan 2020 #67
distraction from Bolton Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #68
+1 crickets Jan 2020 #71
their basic defense today: We're full of shit so you must acquit. Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #74
Philbin is done with his made up shit. Now Suckylow is up BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #76
They keep saying "Executive Privilege" but Drumpf DID NOT INVOKE IT BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #77
That's what I was hollering back at the tv Mersky Jan 2020 #82
I heard your hollering BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #91
Good grief, we've heard some hours of lying, spin, and smears from republicans Mersky Jan 2020 #106
And now Florida is in the house - Pam Bondi BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #78
bet orange trumPutin is enraged ... Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #84
Bought and paid for by Trump years ago. Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #102
To sum up, they're claiming that Trump is accused of high crimes and midemeanors crickets Jan 2020 #79
Fox and Friends stepford clone? Oh, it's Bondi, the bribed DA Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #80
THAT is PAM BONDI !!!! pangaia Jan 2020 #81
She's better at counting. crickets Jan 2020 #83
So cazn my 7 year od nephew... pangaia Jan 2020 #87
Bondi has Trump's money in her pocket. Eyeball_Kid Jan 2020 #105
meow Kali Jan 2020 #85
LOL! I think you're right! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #88
yes MFGsunny Jan 2020 #100
Bwah! Mersky Jan 2020 #101
Why is she talking about Hunter Mossfern Jan 2020 #89
'because' elleng Jan 2020 #90
Burisma! Corruption! crickets Jan 2020 #94
Complete nonsense underpants Jan 2020 #107
Ah... Mossfern Jan 2020 #92
Here comes the CT BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #93
All the broadcast networks must've cut away after the 1st DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #97
****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 1/27/20 THREAD 4**** UP BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #98
None of this excuses Mossfern Jan 2020 #99
No, it doesn't. nt crickets Jan 2020 #104
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIA...»Reply #91